Posted by Bone Ur on 11/08/07 08:16

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:08:25
GMT John Hosking scribed:

>>>>> But here's one idea I had played with.
>>>>>
>>>>> <table><tr><td>item1</td><td>item2</td><td>item3</td></tr></table>
>>>>> <table>
>>>>> <tr>January</td>
>>>>> <tr><td>1</td><td>8</td><td>15</td><td>22</td><td>29</td></tr>
>>>>> <tr><td>99</td><td>99</td><td>99</td><td>99</td><td>99</td></t
>>>>> r>
>>>>> </table>
>>>>>
>>>>> Multiply that 1000 times and you soon see just how huge of a page
>>>>> that would be. I would not be showing all 12 months, at the most,
>>>>> maybe 6.
>
> Multiply it 2,645.29 times and you soon wonder why you're doing it.

Hey, math always makes me wonder why I'm doing it...

>>>>>
>>>>> <flame>
>
> What's this for, to grill a hamburger with? To warm my heart's
> cockles?

'Course. Ya can't go around with cold cockles, can ya?

>>>> Er, 1000 times what you've shown would be 1000 months, not 6. Math
>>>> impaired?
>>> Yes you are apparently.
>>> I was speaking of 1,000 times the data shown, not months.
>
> ...in which the data shown seems to be for one month...
>
>>
>> Oh, I see. -Grammar impaired.
>
> If he's told you once, he's told you: 1,000 times.
> ;-)

It must be the echo...

--
Bone Ur
Cavemen have formidable pheromones.

[Back to original message]