Posted by dorayme on 11/09/07 01:10

In article <47337daf$1@clear.net.nz>,
"Nik Coughlin" <nrkn.com@gmail.com> wrote:

> <li><a href="#">Tribute</a></li>
> <li id="thumbnail">
> <a href="#"><img src="images/photography/1.jpg" /></a>
> <a href="#"><img src="images/photography/2.jpg" /></a>
> <a href="#"><img src="images/photography/3.jpg" /></a>
> <a href="#"><img src="images/photography/4.jpg" /></a>
> <a href="#"><img src="images/photography/5.jpg" /></a>
> </li>
> <li><a href="#">Cloud 9</a></li>
>

This is not really correct because the idea is that the
thumbnails are an expansion of the item Tribute. Your
alternative, below, is correct but it is not pedantic.



> And while you're at it you could be pedantic and say that the thumbnails are
> a list as well:
>
> <li><a href="#">Tribute</a></li>
> <li>
> <ul id="thumbnail">
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/1.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/2.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/3.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/4.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/5.jpg" /></a></li>
> </ul>
> </li>
> <li><a href="#">Cloud 9</a></li>

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]