Posted by Darko on 11/09/07 01:20

On Nov 8, 11:20 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>
> news:jeydnSVWVuqcFa7anZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> > Steve wrote:
> >> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>
> > <crap>
>
> crap? i directly explained how you are not getting what my point was, and
> how the debate you are wanting is not germain to my original point. how is
> that crap?
>
> > You aren't even reading what I'm saying.
>
> really? you are talking about how my style of formatting sql is poor. i, and
> the rest of us, are talking about the fact that formatting should be applied
> to sql. i think that shows at least *one* of us has been paying attention.
>
> > And you should see who started the insults.
>
> really? make a bet with you. go to the earliest thread that you can and
> quote the insult i flung at you. i'll do the same. the one who has the
> earliest date stamp wins, ok?
>
> let's get started...
>
> Message-ID: <8YCdndIBAbkzsq7anZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> jerry: "Don't be an asshole again, Steve"
> jerry: "Yep, programmers with any sense don't do it that way."
> jerry: "I said the way you did it is stupid."
> jerry: "But like anyone with no argument, you keep
> trying to put words into my mouth."
>
> wow, i almost quoted the ENTIRE response dated: 2007-11-08 11:47 AM !!!
>
> ok, now it's your turn. :)
>
> > Sorry, Steve. You're not going to get any rise out of me for your crap.
>
> again, crap? please explain.
>
> > This is my last post to you on the subject.
>
> probably because i gave you direct points for you to address and you can't
> seem to or won't. a proper EOT is when one is either proven wrong, agree to
> disagree, or cannot seem to establish the topic being had. i still don't
> think you realize that it is the latter in this case.
>
> at least support your *evidence* that I STARTED the insults to you. that's
> just an out-and-out L.I.E.. the last post i made did get stern, but
> certainly didn't contain ad-hom's...just restrained frustration.

You should both know, based on your seemingly vast work experience,
the general
rule of aggresive argument - no one started it first, everyone was
just provoked.
(for it sounds good, I must remark it isn't really some official rule,
but something
I made out in the moment :)

What's worse (or better), everyone thinks they're right, so usually no
lies are
included (except maybe for tiny ones ;)

Cheers

[Back to original message]