Posted by Steve on 11/09/07 05:37

"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:hZCdnaHTjuvQTK7anZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:Y6mdnQo6xrC1J67anZ2dnUVZ_tXinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Animesh K wrote:
>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>> Animesh K wrote:
>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's not easy. Are you keeping the articles in a database or text
>>>>>>> files? If the former, you can search the database.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To keep the problem simpler, let's assume that each article has
>>>>>> tags/authors/topic and it is stored in database.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One can view this as a graph-theoretic problem (with the graph being
>>>>>> computed by php and stored in a database). But doing it in an
>>>>>> efficient way would be interesting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scanning the article for probable keywords is the next (and much
>>>>>> harder) step :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for answering,
>>>>>> Animesh
>>>>>>
>>>>> OK, then you need to be in a database newsgroup. How to efficiently
>>>>> search a database is not a PHP problem.
>>>>>
>>>> It is neither a database problem, nor a php problem. It is an
>>>> algorithmic problem, but it *is* implemented by a few websites running
>>>> scripts similar to Php.
>>>>
>>>> I asked here because someone may be knowing by experience.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again,
>>>> Animesh
>>>>
>>> And this group is for PHP coding problems, not esoteric algorithms.
>>>
>>> So this isn't the right group, and now you're saying a database group
>>> isn't the right one.
>>>
>>> Guess it's off to the library for you.
>>
>> what is your major malfunction today, jerry?
>
> Trolls like you.

and to be clear, jerry, i did not pick a fight earlier this morning. you
happily chimed in - ironically enough, in trollish fashion. i'm also not the
one who offered only ad-hom's as argument not failed to counter. that was
you, remember? i also didn't just cowar away. you were talking out of your
ass about some point hardly related to the thread...and then backed out when
pressed.

projection? sounds like.

[Back to original message]