Posted by dorayme on 11/09/07 08:38

In article <1qr3hbl0xduir$.dew6rcfkfsqr.dlg@40tude.net>,
Els <els.aNOSPAM@tiscali.nl> wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
>
> > In article <47337daf$1@clear.net.nz>,
> > "Nik Coughlin" <nrkn.com@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> > This is not really correct because the idea is that the
> > thumbnails are an expansion of the item Tribute. Your
> > alternative, below, is correct but it is not pedantic.
>
> [snip example where the nested ul is inside the list element
> *following* the Tribute list element]
>
> I'll be pedantic then ;-), and say it is not correct. If the
> thumbnails are indeed an expansion of the item Tribute, the list would
> look like this:
>
> <li><a href="#">Tribute</a>
> <ul id="thumbnail">
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/1.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/2.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/3.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/4.jpg" /></a></li>
> <li><a href="#"><img src="images/photography/5.jpg" /></a></li>
> </ul>
> </li>
> <li><a href="#">Cloud 9</a></li>

That will teach me to be so soft-hearted and trusting! I had just
posted at the time:

http://tinyurl.com/27yrkx

what I thought was a *more* correct plan than the OP

and assumed without looking closely that Nick was following this
general idea.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]