Posted by Steve on 11/09/07 16:53

"Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194624587.319538.252680@v2g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On 9 Nov, 14:08, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
>> hmmm. so i was in a thread dealing with a particular subject and posted a
>> reply to a previous post within the thread, dude. did you want to make a
>> dashing, stand-out point here.
>
> And you posted the reply attached to the wrong previous post

'wrong'? no, i responded to the one i intended to respond to.

>> people do what they like
> People like you obviously do. Others have more sense.

'people like me'? you mean those who aren't so bent up about fictious or
preceived rules? and the ones with more sense, those who enjoy the binding
that holds to tightly bundled sticks together. (based on your iq, i doubt
you even get to what that refers.)

>> the irony meter just went of the
>> scale as soon as you tried to talk about things you obviously have *no*
>> idea
>> work.
> Now that's ironic coming from you!

really? here's a clue. when hurling insults that actually hit a target, it
is best to provide examples...like when you say things like usenet does this
or that when it actually doesn't. see, that's so well delivered that the
hilarity is just a side-line bene. the meat of the comment was to show you
have no idea about what you're trying to discuss.

on that note, please inform us all of what irony i specifically provide. if
you don't, we call that a red-herring coupled with ad-homonym - a diversion
from your previous embarrassment. :)

[Back to original message]