Posted by Wyngs on 11/10/07 04:19

jcage@lycos.com wrote:

> On Nov 9, 6:08 am, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> > "Captain Paralytic" <paul_laut...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:1194603188.838479.254790@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > On 8 Nov, 21:40, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
> > > | first of all, it's a thread, dude.
> > > Err no. A thread is a linked collection of posts on a particular
> > > subject. When you post a reply you do so to a previous post within a
> > > thread, dude.
> >
> > hmmm. so i was in a thread dealing with a particular subject and posted a
> > reply to a previous post within the thread, dude. did you want to make a
> > dashing, stand-out point here.
> >
> > > | second, it's usenet. like it, or lump it.
> > > It is not usenet's fault. Usenet is quite capable of attaching
> > > responses correctly. What is needed is a bit of intelligence on the
> > > part of the user, dude.
> >
> > actually, usenet is a venue and takes *no* action in attaching messages to
> > others...dude. perhaps you should have a look at the nntp protocol and learn
> > how it all works. either way, your bit ot an attempt at insults is lost in
> > translation since it went to intellect - the irony meter just went of the
> > scale as soon as you tried to talk about things you obviously have *no* idea
> > work.
> >
> > as for my exact point, it's usenet. people do what they like. the internet
> > and all it's venues are supremely facist-free at this point. bitching about
> > how people behave on the internet is a moot point at best.
> >
> > next time, try harder...dude.
>
> Thanks for your help guys. Appreciate it very much.
> john cage
>
Hahaha.

[Back to original message]