Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 11/12/07 14:21

Chaddy2222 wrote:
> On Nov 12, 9:52 pm, "rf" <r...@invalid.com> wrote:
>> <posting from alt.html>
>>
>> "1001 Webs" <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1194861559.991818.201540@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> Either of two, you're not blind or you don't have any consideration
>>> for real blind people.
>> I let you out of my killfile for a few minutes and this is what rubbish
>> appears.
>>
>> First of all, Chaddy is legally blind. That does not mean his eyes do not
>> work at all, just that his sight is impared such that he is not legally
>> obliged to actually see things. You should read up on the legislation in
>> your own country and in ours (Australia) before casting such black and white
>> assertions. Then again don't, you probably would not understand it anyway.
>>
>> Chaddy's visual acuity is not good but is enough to see his screen in
>> general and to have a feel about what is hapenning on it. It's like looking
>> through some translucant showerscreen glass I believe (Is that right
>> Chaddy?). Chaddy uses assistive technology to respond in this and many other
>> newsgroups, one of the reasons his spelling is so bad :-) but we who know
>> him do not care about this and even enjoy and joke about it, and I am sure
>> Chaddy enjoys the odd such joke.
>>
>> So, Chaddy is quite well (and mind you blindness, or rather visual
>> imparment, or whatever Chaddy likes to call his, is not an illness) able to
>> produce web sites. I have followed his main web site for several years and
>> find it to be an inspiration. We, who know him, offer critical (in the true
>> sense of the word, constructructively critical) advice and he is pleased by
>> this. Chaddy also often offers some rather critical advice to others,
>> particularly from his visual viewpoint. For this we are gratefull and we
>> learn from this. I am sure the recipients of that advice are also gratefull.
>> It is good to hear what ones web site looks like, and operates like, to
>> someone like Chaddy.
>>
>> I have not viewed any of his flash work, as I don't do flash, but I expect
>> it to be a similar standard.
>>
> Hmmmm, it's not bad, i'll probably do some work on it soon though just
> to tidy it up a bit.
>
>> As to Spheric, aka Trevor, who used to go by another handle, I have seen him
>> here as well for a long time, prior to his hiatus. While I do not interact
>> much with him, other than to note his designs go by from time to time (with
>> the odd critique from myself and, of course Chaddy) I respect him as a
>> contributor to this newsgroup, and others.
>>
> Thanks.
>
>> Now, as to you.
>>
>> After having a bit of a run-in with Chaddy (which I still have not found,
>> but I suspect it was just Chaddy stating (as we all do) that your sites
>> suck) and having your balls chopped off my just about everybody who matters
>> to the "regulars" in this group you start off a thread likening Chaddys work
>> to that of how many children. I have just looked at some of these sites (for
>> the first time) and I am willing to say that some of them look OK. Some of
>> them are actually quite good, visually. Many however do not look OK. None of
>> them are up to the standard required by this group and none of them, as far
>> as I can tell, are up to the professional standard exhibited by Chaddy,
>> Trevor, or any of the other "regulars" in this group, especially in regard
>> to (funnily enough) accessibility.
>>
> Oh well that's a surprise.
>
>> <aside>
>> I just visited every site you offered up.
> What are you just really bord or what? siriously!
>
>> Every one of them fails in some way. Images of test. "Click here". Flags
>> indicating countries. Fixed width. All of the things this and other
>> newsgroups would frown upon.
>> </aside>
>>
> Lets just say my dealings with umm school teachers and web design have
> not always been in the favor of decent design such as following the
> proper recommendations etc.
>
>> When Chaddys situation was revealed to you you called yourself a bloody
>> arsehole and indicated you would not return.
>>
> Yeah, I got a bit excited by that prospect just quietly!.
>
>> You lied. You are still here. You are still attacking people whom you know
>> exactly nothing about except from what you may discern from their posts
>> here. Without knowing anything else about them.
>>
>> You truly are a bloody arsehole. One usenet would be better off without.
>>
> Yeah I would prefer "The Hatter" anyday compaired to this cluless GIT
> of a hack.
>
>> Note: You will not get me into a Stukle pissing contest over this. Blather
>> away. I am listening with beer in hand waiting for your next out of your
>> arse statement.
>>
>> Have a good rest of your life.
>>
> BTW it was funny for about ahh half a second.
> Oh yeah look for a thread called on the search or looking for papers
> or something, I really can't be arsed looking it up and I really could
> not be stuffed dealing with this 1001 hack anymore I mean it's just
> not werth the effort.
> KILL FILE IT FOR GOD SAKE!
>
>

Chaddy,

One think Ahmed knows all about is fraud!

Don't worry about him, though. Trolls like him are a dime a dozen.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]