Posted by 1001 Webs on 11/14/07 23:38

On Nov 15, 12:05 am, "dE|_" <d...@crackguitar.com> wrote:
> "1001 Webs" <1001w...@gmail.com> says
>
> >> > I had a look at that site, frankly, I left before it even had time to
> >> > load. I'm only on a dial-up conection and did not want to waste time
> >> > waiting for some stupid looking Flash driven web movie to load!!.
> >> > If you really want to help anyone with a disability, then you should
> >> > just stick with plain old HTML, after all that is what it was created
> >> > for, to make documents accessable to anyone who required them.
>
> >>http://wiki.answers.com:80/Q/How_do_you_know_if_someone_is_a_sociopath
>
> >> Point 3; Grandiose Sense of Self
>
> > But you're MAD !!!
> > Those are Chad's words:
> >http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.disability.issues/browse_thread...
>
> I had a look there and it says nothing about 'sticking with plain old HTML'.
> I am quoting your words, you are looking to lay into others to relieve
> yourself.
No, you're mad as well.
It's right there, in the same thread.
What's wrong with you people, really?

> > That was one of the points I was trying to prove, that he's not the
> > kind, polite person that he tries to portray himself.
> > And now you call him a "sociopath" with a "Grandiose Sense of
> > Self" ?!?
> > Fine diagnostic you've made there ...
>
> Has your quack diagnosed you as a sociopath yet? Seeing as he advised you to
> take it out on Jerry and therefore the whole of Usenet 'if it feels right'
> then he sure ain't a good one.
Again:
It was Jerry and Chad the ones who took it out on me.
For no reason.
And it is absolutely right, using Jerry's words, to "let the World
know", the kind of CRIMINAL he is.

> Point 21; Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations
> where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired.
And now who are we talking about?
Law-breaking, Wife-beating, Jerry?
I don't know about you, but I don't think that kind of tyrannical
behavior should be neither tolerated, nor condoned, or admired.
But that's the way I think, not the one you do, obviously.

[Back to original message]