Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 11/17/07 02:41

Lew wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> Lew wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> comes to large systems. And Java typically requires more CPU cycles
>>>> to do the same job than a compiled language does (again, if both are
>>>> optimized).
>>>
>>> That's just not true. I have shown you many links explaining
>>> otherwise; you've provided absolutely no evidence for your
>>> assertions. Are you following the Big Lie principle - repeat a big
>>> lie often enough and people will start to believe it?
>>>
>>
>> Nope. And I haven't seen any unbiased "proof" in any of your links.
>
> So even the article that favored C++ you regard as biased, eh?
>
> And what is your evidence that these articles were biased? All they did
> was report facts.
>
> I hear rhetoric from you, but no evidence. At least I dug up objective
> results.
>
> You have grown tiresome.
>

Spoken like a true evangelist. My product is better, no matter what
anyone says.

And no, I don't place any trust in any of them because they didn't lay
out detailed conditions for the test. There is not enough information
in any of them to determine how valid the test was.

You have long ago become tiresome. But I still tried to carry on an
intelligent conversation with you. I see now that is impossible.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]