Posted by Tom van Stiphout on 11/17/07 06:44

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:10:51 -0800 (PST), steve <rog11228@aol.com>
wrote:

And those two buildings cannot be more than a few hundred feet apart.
Stunning, indeed.

-Tom.



>On Nov 16, 7:41 am, Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7...@cox.net> wrote:
>> I agree with you, but isn't this a strike against LINQ?
>
>That is funny, an objection to LINQ based on sql injection! :)
>
>LINQ is to a database as asking a child to build a cyclotron. What you
>get is some well intentioned but mangled piece of work that bears
>little relation to reality. What a gigantic waste of resources. Had
>they only brought in people who new even the basic ideas of a 'real
>relational database' MS might well be on the way to breaking new
>ground in an area dormat forever. Now they simply have something they
>can say 'hides' sql from the net developer. It seems what was
>important was to design something, anything, so long as it would
>'hide' sql. If anyone can explain what ideas/principles were being
>followed I'd love to hear from them. MS has a net group and a database
>group. Obviously they need another.
>
>www.beyondsql.blogspot.com

[Back to original message]