Posted by Mika on 11/23/07 08:30

"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote in message
news:e37c0$47460860$40cba7b0$2973@NAXS.COM...
>
> It's a "Spruce Goose", but we informed them that almost to years ago, but
> whatever we say now won't matter they are too deeply committed without an
> "exit strategy"

We are flattered you talk about this like it is a big business. It is just
a hobby done in spare time! We think we have done quite well considering
that being beginners, and that we have incurred little or no startup
expenses. The site is accessed by thousands of repeat visitors monthly.

>> You've posted your site in the past, and as I recall, each time someone
>> told you of problems, not the least of which was load times.
>>
>
> Last time I check it was over 6MB...

6MB is not a load time. This site is clearly labelled as being for the
broadband generation. It says 'broadband recommended' on every page, and in
search engine listings, and the FAQ. 84% of the UK is now on broadband and
this is a UK oriented site. 6MB is about 2 seconds. Clearly that is not
really an issue to keep criticising the site for. As speeds increase this
will only become even less of an issue.

This thread was about a Google/MS issue, but we appreciate any
'constructive' polite comments.

> your page is patchwork Frankenstein

Unlike that.

[Back to original message]