Posted by Mika on 11/28/07 12:18

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:YCc3j.58048$if6.27100@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Mika wrote:
>
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>>> Mika wrote:
>>>> We know, we could rewrite the entire site from scratch, however when
>>>> you balance the cost and time of that with supporting a browser
>>>> which 1% of the people *arriving* at our site have,
>>>
>>> which is probably the most standards-compliant browser available.
>>> It's the only one to pass the Acid2 test. (But I believe I've
>>> already mentioned this.)
>>
>> Zzz yes you did... if you think regular web surfers know or care...
>> :P
>
> Probably not

Glad we agree on something.

>>> Oh, and your iframe does work for me with Opera 9.23.
>>
>> You're on the wrong street. Oxford Street does not load properly on
>> Opera,
>> does it?
>
> Oh, I didn't realize you had different templates for different streets.
> We've been looking at George Street for so long ...
>
> [checks Oxford] The street starts with a London bus with a Harrod's ad
> on the side of it, then horizontally scrolls down the street if I wish
> to do so. I don't see any difference from George.

You really gotta trust us when we say it does not work. Oxford Street on
Opera only goes as far as House of Fraser, then Opera's limitation is
reached. Load Oxford Street in IE or FF and you'll see it goes on for over
a mile.

Please, no more arguing for the sake of it. We know it doesn't work with
Opera, and we don't need to convince anyone else of that fact.

[Back to original message]