Posted by Mika on 11/30/07 12:15

"rf" <rf@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:xLR3j.18784$CN4.7119@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Andy Dingley" <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote in message
> news:26aef9b6-cfff-4fbc-8df5-5fd6325c4fbe@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com...
>> On 30 Nov, 09:51, "Mika" <a...@anon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We accept that the site may not be perceived as good when accessed from
>>> abroad, but if you try it when you are in the UK,
>>
>> I'm in the UK and I have 8M broadband.
>
> Har har har. How about *that* Mika?
>
>> It's _still_ shit.
>
> Agreed.

Nice gang bully mentality there. What's that on your nose Andy? :P

(We notice you didn't comment or go 'har har' about my proving you wrong
saying we had ignored the feedback here, when in fact we have acted on
dozens of things mentioned here. Funny how you omit that isn't it. Har har
har, what about *that*. Har har har zzzzzzz.)

If what you say is true rf, and you find the page does not load in ~5
seconds, then there is something seriously wrong. You are the _only_ one in
the UK.

However we both know that is not the case, and your comment of it being
"****" relates to your personal opinion of the site and concept, rather than
the speed, which has been the complaint from the Americans, to which I
refered to above.

We know we cannot please all the people all the time, and have no
unrealistic expectations to do so. Your thuggish comment is therefore
completely irrelevant, especially to the subject of this thread. All you
are saying by your comment rf, is "some people like some things, other
people like other things". No kidding Shelock. Although we suspect you
hate most things the amount of spite you seem to come on line to vent.

Would be interested to see what innovative websites you have been working
on, and we can let you know whether we think they are "neat" (as others have
said in this group about ours), or "****", although we will choose more
intelligent wording. ;)

Good luck with that attitude,

Mika

[Back to original message]