|
|
Posted by mark4asp on 11/30/07 21:06
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:58:25 -0800 (PST), Travis Newbury
<TravisNewbury@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 29, 9:20 am, Helpful person <rrl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Only 71 validation errors...
>> For fun I once ran sites offering web design services through the
>> validators. Very few of them passed!
>
>I think there are a total of about 27 websites out there that will
>pass, and the owners of them are probably regulars in this group...
>
>As a tool for a website, validation is useful. As a goal it is
>meaningless.
Valid html is meaningless? Do you think I should be putting <br> tags
in the <head> of my code like this joker does. I suppose only if I
include a transitional xhtml doctype header.
I took this from his/her homepage:
><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
><head>
><link rel='shortcut icon' href='favicon.ico' /><br><link rel='icon' href='favicon.ico' /><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>Affordable Website Design</title>
[Back to original message]
|