| 
	
 | 
 Posted by MI5Victim on 12/01/07 11:21 
MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 19 March, 1999 
 
If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This 
 
Please.... keep your response to one page if you can! I have had several 
people faxing my article back to me, including one MP faxing back twenty 
pages. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted without being read. 
 
Theyve started again. Why? I have no idea. 
 
Unhappily, the persecutors, whoever they might be, have started their 
activities again over the last two weeks. Usually they try to blame their 
activities on their victim, but this time they have stopped even 
pretending that the persecution is my fault. Their verbal abuse appears as 
gratuitous as it is vicious. 
 
Last Sunday 14 March, I went for a meal in Londons Chinatown with some 
friends. As we were walking down Gerrard St, a man shouted loudly, twice, 
the obscenity which has been directed at me for some three years now. This 
followed previous incidents where the same words had been used. It is very 
upsetting to be verbally abused in this way and to know that the cowardly 
abusers are guaranteed to "get away with it" because if you report it then 
it will be assumed to be part of your illness. 
 
Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever 
refuses to help. 
 
MI5 Persecution : How to Identify the Persecutors 
 
Usually delusional thinking does not allow the perpetrators to be 
identified, or the alleged persecution to be proved. My so-called 
"delusions" are different, because I have several times over a period of 
some nine years seen the same people, in widely varying places. Most 
importantly, their names have been recorded, on aircraft passenger lists 
and hospital register; and if only the police would do their job 
conscientiously then the persecutors could be identified and this unhappy 
story brought to a final conclusion. 
 
BA93 Heathrow->Toronto, 10 June 1993 
 
In 1993 I flew to Toronto for a holiday. On disembarking from the 
aircraft, a group of four men who travelled together looked in my 
direction, and one of them said, laughing, "If he tries to run away well 
find him". 
 
I was absolutely stunned when I heard this. I wasnt surprised that they 
had followed me to Canada, but it shocked me that they had been on the 
same flight, and that one of them had foolishly given their group 
away. Unfortunately I was so stunned that I made no attempt to stop them 
as they got off the flight and proceeded into the terminal. I did not see 
these people again during my visit to Toronto. I do not know whether they 
followed me, or whether they were only part of a larger group, some of 
whom may have already been on the ground and awaiting my arrival. 
 
Over the next few years I made a number of attempts, all unsuccessful, to 
obtain the passenger list for this flight. British Airways keeps passenger 
flight coupons for each flight; so if only the police would do the job 
that is being asked if them, then these four persecutors could be 
identified, and thus their employing organisation, which is very likely to 
be the Security Service, determined. 
 
These four men were, apart from the joker who looked the odd man out in 
the pack, very serious individuals. They appeared to be in their forties 
or fifties, and my impression on seeing them was that they might have been 
former soldiers. Their campaign against me concentrates on how 
"funny" their abuse is; but in this they are plainly lying, because they 
realise how awful will be the damage to the establishment of which they 
form part, if the truth about the persecution ever sees the light of day. 
 
The riddle of "Alan Holdsworth" 
 
During Oct/Nov 1996 I saw a doctor several times about an infection, and 
on 2 Nov 1996 I went to Emergency at the Ottawa Civic Hospital and saw Dr 
Worthington, who was then Chief of Emergency Medicine. I had to wait 
several hours before being seen, and several people jumped ahead of me in 
the queue. One of these was a grey-haired man in his forties or 
fifties. This may have been one of the men on the BA flight in 1993; I 
cannot be sure. When Dr Worthington asked his name, he loudly said, "Tad", 
which is the common abbreviation of my name. Dr Worthington looked 
puzzled, glanced at the sheet in front of him, and said, "but your name is 
Alan Holdsworth isnt it?". (I am pretty sure his Christian name was 
Alan; I cannot be sure of the surname). The man looked put out, and said 
quietly, "yes". 
 
Unfortunately, I did not follow up this incident immediately. Some time 
later, I wrote to Dr Worthington to ask the name of this patient, but he 
refused to give the name out. 
 
I saw this person again two and a half years later, at Ottawa Airport, 
just as I was about to leave for England. In the warm weather, he was 
wearing a coat and woolly cap, and pacing up and down in a menacing and 
aggressive manner. Presumably he thought he was pretending to be a 
"nutter" and in this way was getting at me; my impression is that he 
doesnt need to pretend, Holdsworth or whatever his name is is clearly a 
psychopath and in a healthy society such a person would be locked up, 
instead of being paid public money to exercise his psychopathic 
instincts. But todays Britain, a country where the MI5 secret police are 
given free rein and nobody dares raise a voice in protest, is not a 
healthy society. 
 
"He doesnt know who we are" 
 
For some reason, whenever I take a British Airways flight, I get hassled 
by the "persecutors who wont admit theyre MI5". Since this business 
started, I have travelled BA three times; once in June 1993 BA93 (see 
above), once to/from Europe during Dec 95/Jan 96, and once in June 1998 
with my mother to visit her family. The last journey, I was abused by two 
"plants" who kept repeating, loudly, "paranoid" (I have this recorded on 
minidisc). Presumably British Airways gives MI5 the seating plans for 
their flights, which allows MI5 to position their agents of abuse three 
rows behind me, so I cant face them, and they are throwing abuse at the 
back of my head. I have travelled BA as infrequently as possible; to 
Canada, I usually travel Air Canada. 
 
Anyway, lets return to the second of the three BA trips, and in particular 
to the flight on 2 January 1996 from Berlin Tegel, to Heathrow, and 
onwards to Montreal Mirabel. Id waited all night at Tegel for the flight, 
and was very tired on reaching Heathrow. On the plane to Montreal, two 
youths sat about three/four rows behind me and to the right, in the window 
seats. One of them, a rather fat "asshole" to use the Americanism  (it 
fits), kept on going on about "this bloke", saying among many other 
things, "he doesnt know who we are". 
 
Now that form of words is particularly interesting, because from May 1995, 
some 8 months previously, I had been vigorously denouncing the "MI5 
Persecution" on Usenet. So if Id guessed wrong, then you might expect the 
harassers to crow about it; which they have not done. If I had guessed 
right, and the persecutors have been silent before and since this flight, 
then they could either admit they were MI5, which would be a very serious 
thing for them to own up to, or they could brazenly lie, in which case I 
would report their lie, and since many people must surely know who they 
are, they would lose all credibility. So they have remained silent; apart 
from this one phrase on the BA flight, where one of their agents said, "he 
doesnt know who we are". Note carefully that this phrase is NOT a denial, 
it only appears to be a denial; since it does not say that my guess was 
wrong; it only states the objective fact that I do not know the identity 
of the persecutors, without giving any information as to the validity of 
my guess. Which leads me to posit that my guess was correct. 
 
1704
 
[Back to original message] 
 |