Reply to Re: Once a week or once a month

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Tom Moreau on 12/07/07 17:20

If memory is truly getting lost or corrupted, then I'd troubleshoot the
specific problem.

--
Tom

----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau


"Neil" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:s2f6j.23284$4V6.14684@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...

> "Neil" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:NQZ5j.69213$RX.4340@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
> OK, that's fine. But my POV is that rebooting in general, and resetting
> the
> system memory, is a good thing to do. I take it that you disagree?
>
> "Michael Abair" <mabair@autotask.com> wrote in message
> news:eTxBHcEOIHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Just because the reboot fixed the issue doesn't mean that a preventative
>> reboot will stop it from occuring.
>>
>> A reboot might not have been needed to resolve the issue in the first
>> place. Possibly a configuration change
>> or bouncing a service could have resolved it. My advice is to spend some
>> time researching the issue and if
>> you cant find a way to resolve it then find a way to detect it and have
>> it
>> perform the least intrusive form of corrective action.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>> "Neil" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:5CY5j.76025$YL5.36846@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>>> Running a SQL 7 system on a Windows 2000 server using Access 2000 on
>>> client machines as a front end. System administrator currently reboots
>>> the server once a month. Yesterday we had some weird thing with the
>>> database where users were getting ODBC errors when trying to access it.
>>> Rebooted the server, everything was fine. Suggested to the sa that he
>>> reboot the server once a week. He said he already does it once a month,
>>> and that's sufficient.
>>>
>>> My POV is that: a) doing it once a week might prevent situations such as
>>> the one yesterday; b) even without situations like the one yesterday,
>>> performance may be degrading over the course of the month, without our
>>> being aware of it, and rebooting once a week might help performance.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>


"Tom Moreau" <tom@dont.spam.me.cips.ca> wrote in message
news:uuaNHcFOIHA.4948@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Why does the system memory need to be reset? I've seen SQL Servers stay
> up
> for months and not need a reboot. That's what High Availability is all
> about.
>
> --
> Tom
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
> SQL Server MVP
> Toronto, ON Canada
> https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
>
>


Just as a general practice with Windows apps, that memory gets lost or
corrupted over time. Perhaps not with SQL Server. But there are other apps
running on it. PC Anywhere is installed as a host on that machine. I don't
know how much memory degradation, if any, occurs from that app. Occasionally
the machine is used to test the front end app (though it's not the primary
machine for that purpose).

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация