Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 12/27/07 14:51

Steve wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:_KqdnZ-phoDSWfvanZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL. You're
>> the only one who's claimed that can be done. And you still haven't shown
>> how it can be done in PHP. If you have, please show me where.
>
> <quote of jerry's initial response to the op>
>
> Not easy, and it can't be done with PHP. The browser needs to process
> the redirect, so you need to do it from the browser end. That means a
> client-side language such as javascript.
>
> cURL could theoretically help you here - but you're asking for a lot of
> work, especially if there are several pages being handled after the
> redirect. You'd have to parse each page to see what to do next.
>
> </quote>
>
> hmmm, you expect the 'it' in "it can't be done with PHP" to mean 'redirect',
> yet think that "curl could theoretically help you here" should somehow be
> taken in harmony with:
>
> <quote>
>
> Nope, I never said you could redirect with post values in cURL.
>
> </quote>
>
> what should we read 'here' to mean, as in "theoretically help you here"? i
> mean, you keep bitching about me showing you to be a liar because i quote
> you out of context. hell, i just supplied the whole damn post. guess what,
> kinda makes you seem like you're...well...lying.
>

You really don't know how to read, do you, Stevie. I said it couldn't
be done in PHP. And that is correct. Period.

Then I went on to say that cURL could help him. But I didn't say cURL
could do the redirect.

You're the only one who has claimed PHP can do redirects.

> as for the programming shit. why would i suddenly jump out and say, "hey
> everyone, i'm a programmer"? there's no reason for me to, and in that case
> ONLY, i'd have to prove the claim. as part of your ad-hom campaign, YOU
> claimed i was NOT a programmer. YOU have to supply proof. i simply reject
> your claim because of lack of proof on your part and first-hand knowlege to
> the contrary. whether i say you're wrong because i have proof to the
> contrary or not, your claim is simply rejected because you have no supporing
> evidence.
>

You're desperately looking for acceptance from someone, some where.

And nope, you're the one who claimed you are a programmer. Prove it.
But you can't, loser.

I'm just rejecting your claim that you're a programmer. You've more
stupidity in these forums than any *real* programmer would. You're
probably just a 14 year old script kiddie. At least that's the level of
understanding you show.

> again, you only see things with half-logic. yes, someone should provide
> proof. that someone is you. anyway, i don't care what you think. and, i'm
> obviously having fun showing you to be mentally deficit and
> dishonest...having waited a few days to see if you'd dropped the whole
> matter. i suppose your recent entanglements with mad-hatter kept you busy
> enough. it was soooo sad to see that even a novice like OMH could articulate
> better reasoning for a solution (that others conferred was better than
> yours) than you could. what was it? oh yeah, to cut down on spam piping
> through your servers, you suggest blocking an entire range of ip
> addresses...failing to note that spam is a hit-once-move-on, covert
> activity. yeah, a static solution to a dynamic problem...THAT hits the spot.
> :)
>

Yep, you claim you're a programmer. Prove it. I reject your claim.

But you can't. That's why you need to try to remain anonymous. You're
deathly afraid someone will find out the truth.

> hell, in this thread you already behave like OMH...now you're even letting
> him get the better of you in giving the most reasonable and logical
> solutions to problems. i wish they had a cure for your alzheimers, the old
> jerry was pretty good at this whole php thing.
>
>
>

ROFLMAO! You wouldn't know logic if it bit you in the ass.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]