Posted by dorayme on 12/30/07 23:45

In article <slrnfng9ds.tns.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:

> On 2007-12-30, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article
> ><doraymeRidThis-995037.10592529122007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> > dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <slrnfnavhr.366.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
> >> Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote:
> >>
> >> > > http://netweaver.com.au/floatHouse/
> [...]
> >> Thanks. I was meaning the css clear on other block level
> >> elements. But perhaps I better make this clearer when I next take
> >> a look.
> >
> > I took a look this morning and added bits. Thanks for this. I
> > also mentioned about the <br>. I did not go into why there was an
> > exception but thanks for reminding me about the probable reason.
>
> One more thing, you say "block formatting element", which is in italics
> as if it were a technical term, but it's not one I've heard. The more
> common expression is "block-level element" which is defined in the spec
> as various things and is what you mean here (divs and paragraphs etc.)

It should be "block-level element" and it is now. Thanks.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]