|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 01/06/08 03:55
RafaMinu wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2:57 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> RafaMinu wrote:
>>> On Jan 5, 3:21 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-bai...@no.where>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>> <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>> In <XrqdnW_lGbgurODanZ2dnUVZ_u_in...@comcast.com> on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nos...@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs <nos...@redcatgroup.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>> Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>> Right. Try again.
>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>> There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>> That's funny. I've gotten quite a few hosting of accounts canceled
>>>> because I've reported spam. Hosting companies DO pay attention to spam
>>>> in alt groups, also. And the good ones don't keep spammers around.
>>> I have already forced you to close one of your SCAM websites:
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.html.critique/browse_thread/thread...
>>> Do you want me to go on with the rest?
>> Sorry, the site is still up and the business is going fine.
>
> WHOIS information for http://www.smartechhomes.com
>
> Registrant:
> SMARTECH HOMES, INC.
> 9920 BRIXTON LANE
> Bethesda, Maryland 20817-1501
> United States
>
> Administrative Contact:
> Stucle, Jerry jstuc...@attglobal.net
> SMARTECH HOMES, INC.
> 9920 BRIXTON LANE
> Bethesda, Maryland 20817-1501
> United States
> 3014696605 Fax --
>
> Jerry Stuckle was the principal of SMARTECH HOMES, INC. which has
> been
> forfeited last year by the Maryland Taxpayer Services Division.
>
> Entity Name: SMARTECH HOMES, INC.
> Dept ID #: D07297567
>
> Principal Office (Current): 9920 BRIXTON LANE, BETHESDA, MD 20817
> Resident Agent (Current): JERRY D. STUCKLE, 9920 BRIXTON LANE,
> BETHESDA, MD 20817
>
> DEPT. ACTION - FORFEITURE 10/06/2006 12:03-AM
> THE ENTITY WAS FORFEITED FOR FAILURE TO FILE PROPERTY RETURN FOR
> 2005.
> For a Maryland entity, its existence has been ended by the State for
> some delinquency.
>
> Good Standing: No
>
> However, more than a year after, Jerry Stuckle, showing a deplorable
> lack of business ethics, stills maintains and deploys the website,
> claiming to belong to a reputable company and offering all kinds of
> products and services.
>
> If you have purchased any products or services from these fraudulent
> pages or have been approached by Jerry Stuckle in any way to offer you
> any kind of commercial transaction involving this fake company after
> 10/06/2006, you have most likely been the victim of a FRAUD.
>
Try again, TROLL. You don't see me advertising this corporation in
these newsgroups.
And BTW - the corporation is not registered in Maryland. Try again, troll.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
[Back to original message]
|