Posted by Gary L. Burnore on 01/06/08 18:30

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:24:22 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
<jstucklex@attglobal.net> claims he's ignoring me but writes:

>Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:36:18 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:00:21 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:14:24 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:26:11 -0500, Gary L. Burnore
>>>>>>>>> <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <XrqdnW_lGbgurODanZ2dnUVZ_u_inZ2d@comcast.com> on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs <nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Right. Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>>>>> My bad - didn't look first at the group list. While perfectly
>>>>>>>>> acceptable in AWW, in a comp group you're right in that its off
>>>>>>>>> charter which *is* enforcable. Perhaps the zealots in AWW should
>>>>>>>>> attempt to have it reclassified into a group that has an official
>>>>>>>>> charter, but in the meantime nobody cares :o)
>>>>>>>> There's really no such thing as a valid charter in an alt.* group.
>>>>>>>> Alt.config is a bogus group of morons who want to turn alt into
>>>>>>>> another form of big8 groups. Never gonna happen. Of course,
>>>>>>>> moderated groups can and do control content but non-moderated groups
>>>>>>>> are freeform. Stukkie will just have to learn to use a killfile
>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, please accept my apologies for the mistake.
>>>>>>>> Accepted. Unfortunately, Jerry won't stop crossposting back to
>>>>>>>> comp.*.
>>>>>>> Sorry, Gary.
>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Let's see you prove that statement, Gary.
>>>> You're doing it for me, Jerry. YOU are still posting to comp.lang.php
>>>> and he's not "making you do it". YOU are the one posting off charter.
>>>> YOU. Not him.
>>>>
>>> And your posts are on topic? ROFLMAO! Pot-Kettle-Black.
>>>
>> How's that ignoring me thing going, stukkie? OOPS, did you LIE again?
>>
>
>ROFLMAO! Keep it up, troll!
>
>>>>> you're just as bad as the troll is.
>>>>>>> I have been attacked and maligned by two trolls in a.w.w
>>>>>>> who have cross-posted to c.l.p. and other newsgroups. I will not let
>>>>>>> those go away.
>>>>>> Because you're owned. Owned owned owned.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud. See if you
>>>>> like it?
>>>> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
>>>> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>>>>
>>> Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running? ROFLMAO!
>>
>> Hahahahaha. DataBasix isn't a WEBSITE, dumbass.
>>
>
>Nope, but you can't keep a website up. ROFLMAO!

From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.

>
>>>>> But you're obviously a troll - familiar over a bunch of newsgroups and
>>>>> message boards on the usenet. A quick search brings up several
>>>>> complaints about your trolling.
>>>> Poor little tard. You should surely soon be quoting that Jerry
>>>> Terranson website and stepping right into kookdom. Once you find it,
>>>> you'll see why I feel safe in saying that people who make up false
>>>> shit about you don't matter. YOU're the one who's making a fool of
>>>> yourself.
>>>>
>>> A lot more than just one website, troll.
>>
>> Bring it on, stuckkie. You know you want to.
>>
>
>Not at all. I don't have to. Too many others have exposed you for the
>troll you are.

Coward.

>
>>>>> So from now on I'll just ignore you - like the ignorant should be.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, it may not be a problem from at least one of these for much longer.
>>>>>> If he loses an account because you lied to his NSP, I'll see to it he
>>>>>> gets a free account. Since you've decided to go play NetKKKop, I'll
>>>>>> take every one of your off charter posts to your provider, comcast. K?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> No lies. Just showing the ISP's what they've done.
>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>> Sorry, troll. No lies.
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>>
>
>Projecting again, Troll?

Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Message-ID: <ZfSdnXhomogIeh3anZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@comcast.com>

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:

>> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud.
>> See if you like it?
>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

[Back to original message]