Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 01/06/08 18:55

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:21:00 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> <jstuckle@attglobal.net> claimed he's ignoring me and then wrote:
>
>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:26:45 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:50:20 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> A FAQ is only a list of frequently asked questions, Jerry. It is no
>>>>>>> way enforceable and can't change the meaning of the word. >> They're
>>>>>>> called alt. for a reason.
>>>>>> Sorry, you 're about 10 years behind the curve.
>>>>> Nope. Not at all, Jerry. Frequently Asked Questions are QUESTIONS AND
>>>>> ANSWERS, not an inforceable doc.
>>>>>
>>>> Guess again, troll.
>>> Still ignoring me, I see. How's that going? Why can't you just stop
>>> adding comp.lang.php?
>>>
>>>> ISP's have closed accounts of your spammer friends
>>>> because they improperly posted spam to alt newsgroups.
>>> Liar I've no spammer friends. I've had the same two accounts for
>>> more than 13 years. Too bad you can't say the same.
>>>
>> ROFLMAO! Your ONLY friends are spammers.
>
> Prove it, stukkie.
>

I don't need to, troll. You're showing it yourself.


>> Nope, I've only had mine for 16 years (email, that is). I haven't had
>> this usenet account for 13 years because comcast hasn't offered it in my
>> area for that long. But I've had it ever since it has been offered.
>
> So? Is that supposed to mean anything?
>

You brought it up, troll.

>
>>
>>>>>>>> Gee, it's the good ones who cancel accounts because I show them the
>>>>>>>> spam.
>>>>>>> Nope. Only a fool would believe what you're calling spam is actually
>>>>>>> spam.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only a fool would believe unsolicited ads where they are not wanted is
>>>>>> not SPAM.
>>>>> Ok, then you'll have no problem when comcast nukes you. Cool.
>>>>>
>>>> No problem at all - but they won't, because I don't spam - unlike you.
>>> Yet another lie. Got any proof I've spammed? Looks like those
>>> calling you a fraud are right.
>>>
>> Hey, you claimed this whole thread is spam, and you're posting in it.
>
> Poor stukkie. I've made it quite clear that this thread isn't spam.
> Looks like it's time to add more posts to the list of your lies. No
> wonder they call you a fraud, you really ARE a fraud.
>

Yea, YOUR OPINION is that it's not spam. But your opinion doesn't mean
shit. Sorry, troll.

>
>
>> So you must be a spammer.
>>
>>>>>>> It's not an argument, it's a fact.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show me where it is a FACT. Otherwise, it is just YOUR OPINION. And
>>>>>> YOUR ARGUMENT.
>>>>> Show me where FAQ means anything other than frequently asked
>>>>> quesitons.
>>>>>
>>>> Who gives a flying fuck what you think?
>>> You obviously do. And, since you cna't answer the question, you
>>> obviously know I'm right.
>>>
>> Not at all. No one gives a flying fuck what you think.
>
> You do.
>

And why do you say that? I'm just having fun exposing your lies and
hypocrisy.

>> And in a.w.w., several of us have gotten spammers kicked off for
>> spamming. Sorry, the ISPs disagree with you.
>
> If it's spam, anyone can get anyone kicked off anywhere (except maybe
> roadrunner). that which you do not like to read isn't spam. Anyone
> who's lost an account bacause you claimed something was spam when it
> wasn't needs to email me. I'll see to it they get access somewhere
> that won't put up with liars like you.
>

Sure, right, troll. People have lost their accounts because ISPs have
investigated and agreed. So you're going to set them up with a spam
friendly host - like you have all of your other spammer friends.

>
>>>> You are nobody.
>>> You are so owned.
>>>
>> Nope, not at all. But you must really be hooked on me to interrupt a
>> conversation and start arguing. It shows just how much YOU are owned.
>>
>> ROFLMAO!
>
> Says the fool who claims he's ignoring me.
>

Yea, I'm having fun exposing you for the ignorant fool you are, troll.
You really liven up my day.

>>>>>>>> They're too far out of date.
>>>>>>> Good thing is, you don't get to decide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Neither do you.
>>>>> Actually, dipshit, I do.
>>>>>
>>>> You wish. Who do you think you are - God? You're just a little asshole
>>>> with a keyboard. Nothing more.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But in this case the op is a troll well-known in a.w.w. He just morphed
>>>>>>>>>> names, and it took a little while to catch on (good catch, Karl!).
>>>>>>>>> SO? What does that have to do with comp.lang.php?
>>>>>>>> I didn't start it.
>>>>>>> So you're so controlled you simply MUST post to comp.lang.php. Got
>>>>>>> it. You're owned, bigtime.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have the right to defend myself
>>>>> And you have every right to have your posting priv's at giganews nuked
>>>>> for off charter posts to a comp group.
>>>>>
>>>> Like this posting if yours is off topic? Maybe you need to get nuked?
>>> Let's review. You post crap to comp.lang.php, I ask you to stop. I'm
>>> not crossposting to comp.lang.php, I'm already here. OOPs, you lose
>>> again.
>>>
>> You don't own usenet.
>
> I own part of it. :)
>

You probably don't even own the computer you're on. It probably belongs
to your mommy and daddy.

>
>> And I'm in c.l.p., also. In fact, much more
>> regular here than you are.
>
> You're wrong more, too. :) I note that most people in comp.lang.perl
> think you're a dick.
>

Who cares? I don't post in comp.lang.perl. But you don't know that
because you don't frequent it, either.

>> So I guess you're posting crap to c.l.p., and you need to be nuked!
> Go for it, dipshit.
>
>

You're the one who claimed I should be nuked for posting off topic. I
just pointed out the hypocrisy you have.

>> You can keep denying it. You can't decide anything. You're only a
>> legend in your own mind. You have no power.
>
> Hahaha. Yet another IKWIABWAY. You're really good at repeating what I
> say, poodle.
>

Projecting again, troll?

>
> Jerry claims suing is illegal
>
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
> are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.
>
>
>
> Jerry on websites:
>
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> Message-ID: <ZfSdnXhomogIeh3anZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> > <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud.
> >> See if you like it?
> >
> > Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> > DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
> >
>
> Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
> ROFLMAO!
>
> While also saying
>
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
> can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.
>
>

Yep, learn to read. And go ahead and find the site. I challenge you to
do so. You're so powerful - it should be no problem.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]