Posted by Steve on 01/07/08 19:34

"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:ILydnX1wJLaF6B_anZ2dnUVZ_uninZ2d@comcast.com...
> Steve wrote:
>> "Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in message
>> news:flr5nu$ikf$4@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>
>>> Jerry claims suing is illegal
>>>
>>> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
>>> Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>
>>>
>>> You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
>>> are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.
>>
>> look, gary...jerry is functionally illiterate and has trouble with
>> completing thought processes. it could be because of his advanced
>> geriatics,
>> or just a mental facility limitation due to piss poor genetics. either
>> way,
>> he can't logically put that together. help him out some so that at least
>> he'll eventually face his blatant stupidity...which is when he leaves
>> threads.
>>
>> here jerry-berry...
>>
>> 'but i don't need to sue you.' (logical case A)
>> 'i prefer the legal ways.' (logical case B)
>>
>> A can set the context for B, which by reference means you consider A to
>> be
>> illegal.
>>
>> 'there are other ways to handle people like you.' (logical case C)
>>
>> C does NOT give logical cause to SET THE CONTEXT that A is legal or
>> illegal...A just very well may be an illegal alternative to handling
>> people,
>> but, you just don't prefer that option.
>>
>> this is yet ANOTHER fine demonstration of jerry being ILLITERATE AND
>> ILLOGICAL. any claim he's made that defends the 'clarity' of his remark
>> merely makes that fact scream out! further, demeaning you, gary, for your
>> interpretation of jerry's comment makes his pea-sized brain failings not
>> only scream, but dance around and do cartwheels.
>>
>> :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Talking things out of context again, stalker? ROFLMAO!

out of context? lol. i just showed you how literate people read. we come to
the same conclusion. you essentially said that suing people is illegal. the
whole paragraph is there. and this is just a for-instance. in another
thread, you thought you'd given a perfectly good answer to *what* and *why*
by simply answering *yes*. countless examples of your inability to
comprehend what you read.

that's not roflmao...that's sad.

> But that's OK. I OWN YOU, TOO!

you own ass-cream so it don't hurt as much. don't worry, with the frequency
you seem to be getting it in comp.lang.php you'll build up callouses in no
time. you then only have to worry about std's.

> Speak, boy, speak!

un-original phrase theif.

[Back to original message]