Posted by palun on 01/11/08 10:44

You are right. I should deploy it (though it looks terrible right now).
BTW: I did validate it and that seems ok apart from the
"wicket:id"-attributes on some of the tags (required by the wicket
framework -- great stuff if you know some java)
/u

Ben C skrev:
> On 2008-01-11, palun <flume2001@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Terribly sorry. My mistake. (I wrote the code in the message. Should
>> have copied.)
>>
>> Anyway, the code is correct in the CSS-file (and it still doesn't work).
> [...]
>>>> But the content ("Some stuff") still gets spread out over the whole page...
>>> It's always a good idea to validate the HTML and CSS before asking for
>>> help:
>>>
>>> #anId {
>>> width: 400px;
>>> }
>
> I assure you width does work. There must be something else going on:
> perhaps another more specific style sets width back to auto, perhaps you
> mis-typed the selector, perhaps the contents overflow.
>
> This is why you have to post a url.

[Back to original message]