Posted by serge on 08/01/05 04:39
> 1. Should I keep using the mdb as frontend or switch to an adp (access
> project) instead? Any reasons?
I have not been developing in Access for about 2 years now. In 2002 I
converted an Access mdb to ADP using Office 2000 then Office XP
with SQL Server 7.
Back then and now I am pretty sure nothing major changed (I might be wrong)
as most of the experienced Access developers would not bother switching
from MDB to ADP. They did not see any advantages of doing so.
Now I would not argue with that point as back then I did a lot of research
on the same question but I decided to switch to ADP. The reasons I did
so is because since I was switching to SQL Server as the backend, I
preferred to have my Access database directly connected to a SQL
Server backend instead of relying on ODBC and Linked tables.
I had to learn ADO too to make the data communication as I was
using unbound forms everywhere (which basically some people would
say it would defeat the purpose of using Access altogether and would
recommend using VB instead).
I would suggest you stay with mdb for the time being and not waste
your time with ADP. If you find the time to redo your frontend then
I recommend you use VB .NET instead of Access.
I also suggest you post the same questions here on
comp.databases.ms-access and see what the latest story is on
ADP/MDB and VB.NET.
I haven't followed the Access community for a couple of years now
so I am not sure where Microsoft Access is heading towards in the
future.
> 3. Is it possible for access frontend to connect/link to two separate SQL
> Server dbs, main and archive at the same time?
Sure, if you use VB Code you can open as many connections as you want
to other SQL Server databases. You don't need to think you are limited
by the ODBC Linked Tables connection to one SQL Server database.
Nothing prevents you from creating a new connection using code, accessing
the data and then closing the connection.
Good Luck with your research and decision.
[Back to original message]
|