Posted by dorayme on 12/02/95 12:00

In article <Xns9A27A6D562233nanopandaneredbojias@85.214.90.236>,
Neredbojias <monstersquasher@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:36:25 GMT
> dorayme scribed:
>
> > In article <8oqro396d20dbh3b9pdpj0g4gc4h307pa6@4ax.com>,
> > XyZed <andy@washerhelp.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> Is there an accepted different technique these days to deal with wide
> >> screens or should a page still be set to take up the whole page?
> >
>
> > It is worth using max-width (supported by most browsers including
> > IE7 now, but not 6). You can use it on body (there are some
> > issues about this), you can *make* a wrapper for the site and use
> > it on the wrapper, you can use it on the parts of the site by eg,
> > giving the content a max width in px or ems (I recommend em here)
> > after having given any side bars widths (in px or ems)
>
> Yeah but too bad it don't work on the human body (and I'm claustrophobic
> about girdles.)

So, what are you saying? That you are fat as well as everything
else?

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]