Posted by Gary L. Burnore on 01/18/08 20:33

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:21:10 +0100, Adam Frame <mistraal@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Steve wrote:
>> "Ali Bobo" <1001webs@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:3b0a3c54-0c8a-4465-9e33-566f84ecd966@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>> 1. PHP.NET the greatest API resource known to MAN
>>
>> completely relative statement. i can safely assume you've not experienced
>> *all* api's known to man!
>>
>>> 2. If you have a problem, someone will have already implemented a
>>> solution in PHP for you
>>
>> and this is in contrast to the support and examples/solutions afforded asp?
>> think again.
>>
>>> 3. Syntax is better, closer to C, C++, and Java. Unlike VB where
>>> anything goes.
>>
>> uhhhh, php is just as loose as asp - which is *vb script* NOT VB. asp.net,
>> however, is more OOP capable than php AND forces strong data-typing. troll.
>>
>> as for which stylistic preference you have in writing code, who gives a
>> fuck?!!!
>>
>>> 4. To run ASP you need IIS on windows, which is not free, for PHP
>>> however you need Linux and Apache which are FREE!!
>>
>> sorry, wrong again! i can run asp on linux boxes running apache. that
>> technology is at least 8 years old, idiot.
>>
>>> 5. Great built in support for ftp, email, graphics package GD2 and
>>> also MySQL (also FREE).
>>
>> and, asp has *greater* built in support for these and more. last time i
>> checked, ms was giving asp.net AND a world-class IDE for it's development
>> away...i.e. FREE.
>>
>> next dumbass remark?
>>
>>> 6. PHP will run on Unix, Linux, Solaris and Windows. ASP is mainly
>>> only Windows associated but you can use it on linux with additional
>>> modules installed.
>>
>> which completely bastardizes your statement number 4...along with mooting
>> itself in the process. are you that brain-dead?
>>
>>> 7. PHP code is much faster, ASP is developed on the COM based
>>> architecture, this is an overhead for the server.
>>
>> and what version of asp are you talking about? the one from 8 years ago? asp
>> as of right now can backwardly support com. it's architecture is completely
>> OOP based and everything runs from a NON-COM based framework. asp performs
>> equally in speed to php and in a lot of cases, outperforms it. one of the
>> benefits of a company that creates a web language and also providing the os
>> on which it will run, the functionality is built into the kernel itself.
>>
>>> 8. mod_rewrite, need I say more.
>>
>> the answer is, you need to say something that applies. mod_rewrite is
>> apache, not php. as i can run asp via apache, your point is moot...again!
>>
>>> 9. Advanced Perl-compatible regular expression functions and loads
>>> of built in support for regular expressions on the whole.
>>
>> funny how think, or imply, that asp and regex are strangers to eachother.
>> specifically, if i develop a vb < .net application, i have to reference the
>> *scripting* library (you know, the web version of vb) in order to use regex.
>> asp has *always* supported regex...vb.net is the first time regex was
>> directly supported, without COM, in vb. geee, why would that be? because NO
>> NEW LANGUAGES BY MS HAVE A COM ARCHITECTURES.
>>
>>> 10. Greater control over error handling, and more detailed error
>>> messages.
>>
>> last i checked, try/catch/finally was introduced to asp around the same time
>> it was supported in php. and, since it's the same construct, how do you
>> suppose php has greater control. further, both php and asp allow you to
>> generate customer error messages. as for the defined errors, i can only
>> laugh. leave out a semi-colon in php, run the page in the browser and tell
>> me exactly what the error means...not to mention WHERE the *actual* error
>> is. ROFLMFAO !!!
>>
>> and, btw, when could you ever seemlessly integrate external resources (not
>> just modules) into php. oh shit! you mean you had to use COM(). lol. in asp,
>> if an api exists, i can consume it.
>>
>> how easy is it to set up php for debugging?
>>
>> can you use vb, c#, c, c++, or any one of 23 others to develop a php
>> solution?
>>
>> can you switch, in code, mid-stream to from one language to another?
>>
>> if you have no clue as to the technology against which you are making
>> comparisons, how the fuck can you expect to be taken seriously?!!! further,
>> how can you ever expect to pick the right tool for the job...which is
>> COMPLETELY what makes one better than the other! it's all relative to
>> changing factors that you don't even consider, troll.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Do you get a kick out of insulting people on the internet?

He gave a good answer. You didn't like it, eh?

>You, sir are in need of a mouthwash with a bar of soap.

Bad grammar aside, who's going to do it? YOU?

--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

[Back to original message]