|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 01/20/08 11:20
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:40:18 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <a@b.c>
wrote:
>Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> Ali Bobo wrote:
>>> On Jan 16, 7:31 pm, "Steve" <no....@example.com> wrote:
>>>> "Ali Bobo" <1001w...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:3b0a3c54-0c8a-4465-9e33-566f84ecd966@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>> 1. PHP.NET the greatest API resource known to MAN
>>>> completely relative statement. i can safely assume you've not
>>>> experienced
>>>> *all* api's known to man!
>>>>
>>>>> 2. If you have a problem, someone will have already implemented a
>>>>> solution in PHP for you
>>>> and this is in contrast to the support and examples/solutions
>>>> afforded asp?
>>>> think again.
>>>>
>>>>> 3. Syntax is better, closer to C, C++, and Java. Unlike VB where
>>>>> anything goes.
>>>> uhhhh, php is just as loose as asp - which is *vb script* NOT VB.
>>>> asp.net,
>>>> however, is more OOP capable than php AND forces strong data-typing.
>>>> troll.
>>>>
>>>> as for which stylistic preference you have in writing code, who gives a
>>>> fuck?!!!
>>>>
>>>>> 4. To run ASP you need IIS on windows, which is not free, for PHP
>>>>> however you need Linux and Apache which are FREE!!
>>>> sorry, wrong again! i can run asp on linux boxes running apache. that
>>>> technology is at least 8 years old, idiot.
>>>>
>>>>> 5. Great built in support for ftp, email, graphics package GD2 and
>>>>> also MySQL (also FREE).
>>>> and, asp has *greater* built in support for these and more. last time i
>>>> checked, ms was giving asp.net AND a world-class IDE for it's
>>>> development
>>>> away...i.e. FREE.
>>>>
>>>> next dumbass remark?
>>>>
>>>>> 6. PHP will run on Unix, Linux, Solaris and Windows. ASP is mainly
>>>>> only Windows associated but you can use it on linux with additional
>>>>> modules installed.
>>>> which completely bastardizes your statement number 4...along with
>>>> mooting
>>>> itself in the process. are you that brain-dead?
>>>>
>>>>> 7. PHP code is much faster, ASP is developed on the COM based
>>>>> architecture, this is an overhead for the server.
>>>> and what version of asp are you talking about? the one from 8 years
>>>> ago? asp
>>>> as of right now can backwardly support com. it's architecture is
>>>> completely
>>>> OOP based and everything runs from a NON-COM based framework. asp
>>>> performs
>>>> equally in speed to php and in a lot of cases, outperforms it. one of
>>>> the
>>>> benefits of a company that creates a web language and also providing
>>>> the os
>>>> on which it will run, the functionality is built into the kernel itself.
>>>>
>>>>> 8. mod_rewrite, need I say more.
>>>> the answer is, you need to say something that applies. mod_rewrite is
>>>> apache, not php. as i can run asp via apache, your point is
>>>> moot...again!
>>>>
>>>>> 9. Advanced Perl-compatible regular expression functions and loads
>>>>> of built in support for regular expressions on the whole.
>>>> funny how think, or imply, that asp and regex are strangers to
>>>> eachother.
>>>> specifically, if i develop a vb < .net application, i have to
>>>> reference the
>>>> *scripting* library (you know, the web version of vb) in order to use
>>>> regex.
>>>> asp has *always* supported regex...vb.net is the first time regex was
>>>> directly supported, without COM, in vb. geee, why would that be?
>>>> because NO
>>>> NEW LANGUAGES BY MS HAVE A COM ARCHITECTURES.
>>>>
>>>>> 10. Greater control over error handling, and more detailed error
>>>>> messages.
>>>> last i checked, try/catch/finally was introduced to asp around the
>>>> same time
>>>> it was supported in php. and, since it's the same construct, how do you
>>>> suppose php has greater control. further, both php and asp allow you to
>>>> generate customer error messages. as for the defined errors, i can only
>>>> laugh. leave out a semi-colon in php, run the page in the browser and
>>>> tell
>>>> me exactly what the error means...not to mention WHERE the *actual*
>>>> error
>>>> is. ROFLMFAO !!!
>>>>
>>>> and, btw, when could you ever seemlessly integrate external resources
>>>> (not
>>>> just modules) into php. oh shit! you mean you had to use COM(). lol.
>>>> in asp,
>>>> if an api exists, i can consume it.
>>>>
>>>> how easy is it to set up php for debugging?
>>>>
>>>> can you use vb, c#, c, c++, or any one of 23 others to develop a php
>>>> solution?
>>>>
>>>> can you switch, in code, mid-stream to from one language to another?
>>>>
>>>> if you have no clue as to the technology against which you are making
>>>> comparisons, how the fuck can you expect to be taken seriously?!!!
>>>> further,
>>>> how can you ever expect to pick the right tool for the job...which is
>>>> COMPLETELY what makes one better than the other! it's all relative to
>>>> changing factors that you don't even consider, troll.
>>>
>>> I just copy&pasted it, from the link at the bottom.
>>> You are quite right and I thank you for your valuable opinion.
>>> I have several friends that have opted for ASP over PHP and I wanted
>>> to understand the reasons.
>>>
>>> Just two more questions:
>>> 1- Do you actually prefer ASP to PHP?
>>> 2- A bit off-topic but, What do you make of this statement?:
>>> The paragraphs below describes W3Schools' vision about future
>>> Internet Distributed Applications:
>>> "Executables, C++ (and Java too) must die
>>> Neither C++ nor Java can ever create standard components that can run
>>> on all computers. There is no room for these languages in future
>>> distributed applications. Executables are not standard. COM objects
>>> are not standard, DLL-files are not standard. Registry settings are
>>> not standard. INI-files are not standard. None of these components
>>> must be allowed to destroy your dream of a standard distributed
>>> application that will run on almost any computer in the world."
>>> http://www.w3schools.com/ngws/ngws_standards.asp
>>>
>>
>> All of this are the opinions of one or two people who put together a web
>> site. Nothing more, nothing less. It is worth exactly what you paid
>> for it.
>>
>> Of course not everything's standard. That's because different people
>> have different needs. And it will always remain that way.
>>
>
>Indeed, however they left out the most important reason to use PHP
>
>It's not, never has been, and never will be, "Cursed By Microsoft".
>
>This to me is so overwhelming, that all other reasons pale into
>insignificance.
>
>Nothing that Microsoft gets involved with ever works properly
>thereafter. The temptation to make it only work with Microsoft products,
>and if possible only the LATEST and MOST EXPENSIVE Microsoft products,
>is usually overwhelming.
You're just as fuckin stupid as the person who wrote the shit in the
OP. I mean either you can step the fuck up and post actual examples
and situations in which ASP fails and PHP does not...or you can't.
Yer just another dumbfuck (ie blind Microsoft hater), no different
from the dumbfuck Mac humping flunkies or the dumbfuck Linux lovin ass
stains...all y'all are a bunch of fuckin retards plain and simple.
You base your NONpinions on trivial stupidity often directly linked to
your short between the keyboard and chair, blaming your stupidity on
Microsoft and grasping at anecdotal lames you slurped off some
tweenage muppet fuck run Webbie board. 10 times out 10 when someone
claims their problem is caused by Microsoft...it's really caused by
their own stupidity, usually because Microsoft didn't hold their
bumbling hand enough through the setup/installation or the system
their running is using crap ass factory seconds garbageware they
bought off eBay.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."
"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."
"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
[Back to original message]
|