Posted by mrcakey on 01/24/08 10:28

"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:doraymeRidThis-AB6AF1.10403124012008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <5vpg60F1n7jcqU1@mid.individual.net>,
> Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removethis@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> > Really not the same thing is it?
>>
>> Why do people respond to analogies this way?
>
> Because they are don't understand them, they don't understand
> their scope. (I thought your analogy quite good btw)

Again, not true. It was clearly understood, I just don't agree with its
underlying assumptions.

+mrcakey

[Back to original message]