|
Posted by Steve on 01/25/08 21:41
"Ali Bobo" <1001webs@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:54cc258f-89aa-4af1-8da8-397e1ee3607a@v29g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 23, 7:02 am, Onideus Mad Hatter <use...@backwater-
> I doubt it will. Even .Net, the new secure infrastructure, and built
> with security in mind, lets you have access to the 'old ways'. Yes,
> you are not supposed to, but people somehow do, and hackers will.
> Microsoft and its customer are addicted to backwards compatibility in
> a way that makes a heroin addict look silly.
yes, it's called keeping customers (for ms) and, not redesigning your entire
business application layer (for the customer). that's silly?
> And if Microsoft does change its ways, what incentive will you have to
> stick with Microsoft? If you have to start over from scratch to build
> your app in this new, secure Microsoft environment, will you pay the
> hundreds or thousands of dollars to go the Microsoft route, or the $0
> to go with Linux?
$0 with linux? that's a blanket statement without context and lends itself
very ammenably to fit, in forfieture, in the recyling bin.
> In the enterprise Linux space, 2006 was marked by greater expansion of
> Linux into vertical markets, new products, and most notably, a string
> of surprise business deals among vendors.
i get the impression, ali, that you've no idea what you've just said...hmmm,
all i need is some proof...
> Additional companies entered the Linux vendor pool this year, as well,
> with the rollouts of new multifunctional network management
> appliances, antivirus products, business intelligence (BI) software,
> and other third-party wares at Networld + Interop, LinuxWorld, and
> other computing conferences.
same as the above...but, where's my proof? oh yeah, happily plagurized from
the link you posted here:
> http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3651486
i knew i shouldn't give you too much credit for sounding 'credible'.
compared to your other posts, you actually started to sound smart...until i
see that you've merely mastered CTL+C, CTL+V.
;7)
[Back to original message]
|