|
|
Posted by Adrienne Boswell on 01/26/08 16:20
Gazing into my crystal ball I observed Knut Krueger
<knut.krueger@usa.com> writing in news:fnf78v$q8t$01$1@news.t-
online.com:
> Hi to all,
> There is an short example in the German selfhtml.og pages:
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
><html><head><title>display</title>
><style type="text/css">
> div.table { display:table; border-collapse:collapse; }
> div.tr { display:table-row; }
> div.td { display:table-cell; border:thin solid red; padding:5px; }
></style>
></head><body>
>
><div class="table">
> <div class="tr">
> <div class="td">ich</div>
> <div class="td">bin</div>
> <div class="td">eine</div>
> <div class="td">Tabelle</div>
> </div>
></div>
>
></body></html>
>
In addition to what Ben C said, if the content really is tabular data,
use the right tool for the job - a table. Personally, I can't really
see any reason to use display:table when there is a perfectly good
element already available, it just adds more confusion, and the
potential for "divitis".
--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share
[Back to original message]
|