|
|
Posted by "Satyam" on 08/15/05 15:55
I went googling for XML validators and tried your sample in both forms, as
you sugest with CDATA and my way:
<root>
<data><?php require_once("read_database.php"); ?></data>
</root>
Both are valid. The relevant paragraph can be found in:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/#sec-pi
Notice that while <?php is a valid start tag the shorthand <? is not since
it is missing what the standard calls the Processing Instruction Target, or
PITarget, for short. This PITarget is the application that is supposed to
understand this PI. The XML standard says nothing about the contents and
syntax of whatever is within the PI tags, only that it cannot contain a ?>
Satyam
"Torgny Bjers" <torgny@xorcode.com> wrote in message
news:430056C7.80600@xorcode.com...
> Well, in this case, XML would care, since you'd be using a < or > inside
> a tag, so, in order for that to work, if what he meant was that he
> wanted to store PHP code directly inside the XML document, and not
> actually EXECUTE code INSIDE the XML file, he would have to use
> <![CDATA[bla]]> syntax around the PHP code for it not to break the XML
> file.
>
> So, in this case that would be:
> <root>
> <data><![CDATA[<?php require_once("read_database.php"); ?>]]></data>
> </root>
>
> Which works fine as long as he doesn't have ]]> somewhere in the code. :)
>
> Satyam wrote:
>
>>Whatever starts with <? immediatly followed by an identifier is called a
>>Processing Instruction, which ends with a ?> XML doesn't care what is
>>within those tags, as long as it doesn't contain a ?>
>>
>>Satyam
>>
>>
>>
>>""Labunski"" <romans@skulme.lv> wrote in message
>>news:31.DD.33075.C2700034@pb1.pair.com...
>>
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document?
>>>
>>>e.g. I want to add <?php require_once("read_database.php"); ?> to the xml
>>>document, but
>>>I don't know the right syntax to do this.
>>>
>>>Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page.
>>>
>>>Thanks a lot!
>>>Roman
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
[Back to original message]
|