Posted by Adie on 08/15/05 04:02

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:55:17 -0400, dave hillstrom wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:46:42 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>
>>Adie wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:17:27 +0100, Mimic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Adie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Quite simply because any pillock can get a handle on developing on the
>>>>>.NET/MS platform.
>>>>
>>>>"There are two games in town, MS and Java. Fuck off
>>>>if you have neither." [adie]
>>>>
>>>>LOL, autoflame grade A+
>>>
>>>
>>> How so?
>>
>>Well you basically just called yourself a moron. You DO comprehend that
>>right? Of course if a "pillock" could do it, it stands to reason a
>>genious probably could also. But then a genious, or anyone with more
>>than half a braincell infact, wouldnt have made a statement such as you did.
>>
>>Now go have you trolling fun someplace else. Youve proved you are
>>incapable of even the simplest of concepts.
>
> trying to disengage, mimic? cant "hack" it anymore? saying that adie
> called himself a moron is different from proving that hes a moron. or
> do you believe everything people tell you simply because they say its
> so?
>
> given his statement and the statement you dragged up for comparison,
> please point out, logically, why they are opposites? i mean, in the
> first statement, adie says that .NET/MS is simple to learn. in the
> second statement that you quote, adie says that MS and Java are the
> predominant platforms for something that you didnt quote. please tell
> me how those two statements logically clash? i mean, you went and found
> the second one to show up adie, so tell us all how it does? dont be
> shy. tell us why the two quotes, compared together logically, make adie
> to be as simple as you would like to believe. go on, tell us, mimic.
> we're all waiting.

They're logically consistent observations, and the Autoflame stuff is just
absurd, as Mimic miraculously spotted; a genius could also use the .Net
platform, and anyway, where did I say I'm .Net web developer?

[Back to original message]