Posted by [spooky.action] on 08/26/05 03:54

<snip>

>>Hatter seriously, people are trying to help you.
>
> Uh huh, sure kid. All I'm seein is that the same stuff I was doing
> TWO YEARS ago that you were bitching incessantly about is suddenly
> bein slurped up by all you deficient little assholes. Apparently that
> means that *I* set the standards and you stupid bitches are just two
> years out of date.

Like what? You start ranting about how great Flash is after it's been out
for years. I wonder why your sudden interest in Flash? Was trying to
actually code getting too hard for you? Now you discovered you can
just point and click yourself a website just like you used to in Frontpage
and Dreamweaver, no wonder you suddenly love it. Now you don't have to
learn real HTML or worry about having to use transitional DTDs so modern
browsers can understand all the deprecated HTML you use. Just because you
don't understand it, doesn't mean it "sucks". Whats even more ironic about
your criticisms of AHA is your site has all the same failing and then
some. Whats "fluid" about your site? Hell, you don't even know how to
position elements in CSS, you have to frame your site just to get it to
center. It's interesting that your harshest criticisms are of things you
can't do. Well I shouldn't say that, you could learn it, you just
choose not too. Who do you think your fooling? You may be able to pull one
over on a bunch of diaper wearing freaks (assuming that you were actually
lying to them) but you can't fool us, especially when we can just view the
source of your sites and see what your really capable of.

>>Whether you believe
>>what we say or not is upto you. But rest assured, you are NOT years
>>ahead of everyone else in webdev. What you are doing isnt done by
>>professionals for the simple fact that it doesnt work and/or isnt
>>suitable or productive.
>
> Of course it's not, I mean it requires a shit load of skill to be able
> to use say Flash in a manner that's as productive as deficiently
> easier alternatives (which aren't as cross browser compatible, cross
> platform compatible or cross resolution compatible). There are really
> only a handful of people on the entire fuckin planet who even have
> that level of skill. Because of that, no, it's not something that's
> going to be implemented by every stupid jackass who runs around the
> net claiming to be a "world renown web architect".
>
>>You've only just jumped on the Flash craze from
>>the LAST CENTURY,
>
> Actually no, Stupid. The "Flash craze" as you call it from the "LAST
> CENTURY" was all about using Flash from an animation
> perspective...however recently Flash has gone from something that used
> to only be good for animation to an incredibly powerful web
> development tool...of course, like I said, it ain't easy (yet) which
> is why the stupid deficient bitches like you haven't all jumped on the
> new Flash bandwagon. But hey, I give ya morons two years, I'm sure
> Flash related app makers will have made it real cookie cutter for you
> drooling retards by then.
>
> --
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.backwater-productions.net

[Back to original message]