|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 08/26/05 07:01
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 03:32:48 GMT, "[spooky.action]"
<spooky.action@a.distance.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:18:17 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:54:19 GMT, "[spooky.action]"
>> <spooky.action@a.distance.net> wrote:
>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>Hatter seriously, people are trying to help you.
>>>>
>>>> Uh huh, sure kid. All I'm seein is that the same stuff I was doing
>>>> TWO YEARS ago that you were bitching incessantly about is suddenly
>>>> bein slurped up by all you deficient little assholes. Apparently that
>>>> means that *I* set the standards and you stupid bitches are just two
>>>> years out of date.
>>
>>>Like what? You start ranting about how great Flash is after it's been out
>>>for years. I wonder why your sudden interest in Flash?
>>
>> http://actionscript-toolbox.com/samplemx_loadvars.php
>>
>> and this:
>>
>> this._quality = "best";
>> (the latter of which can be used to create perfect liquid websites
>> with absolutely no effort at all).
>>
>>>Was trying to
>>>actually code getting too hard for you? Now you discovered you can
>>>just point and click yourself a website just like you used to in Frontpage
>>>and Dreamweaver, no wonder you suddenly love it. Now you don't have to
>>>learn real HTML
>>
>> LOL, only an ignorant like you would think that there's no coding in
>> Flash. Hell, you can't really DO anything in Flash (outside of simple
>> animation) WITHOUT some kind of code.
>And when I see some in your Flash design I might think otherwise.
Wait a couple weeks, I've still got some client projects I need to
finish. I've been toying with the idea of making my blog completely
in Flash and then adding a user interface where people can leave
comments and what not.
>>> or worry about having to use transitional DTDs so modern
>>>browsers can understand all the deprecated HTML you use.
>> I make my own DTDs now, Bitch. What's the matter, don't you know how?
>> Is teh code too much for you? I guess you just like the point and
>> click DTD declarations you get in Frontpage, huh my lil projectionist.
>I think you mean make up.
If they're made up, how do they validate:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.backwater-productions.net
Don't you even fuckin comprehend what a DTD is? Free cl00, MORON,
it's just a line of fuckin code at the top of yer web page. *rolls
eyes*
>>>Whats even more ironic about
>>>your criticisms of AHA is your site has all the same failing and then
>>>some. Whats "fluid" about your site?
>> I have more than one you know, this is the site I was referring to:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/liquid/index.html
>> The only true liquid website in existence.
>No matter how much you keep telling yourself that, it doesn't make it any
>more true.
No matter how many times you say that or how many paragraphs of
bullshit you spew out...
>Many people have tinkered with that idea, I worked with
>something similar years ago at an old gig using Perl and Imagemagick, but
>like everyone else that experimented with it, I came to the same
>conclusion. It isn't practical because of the load it puts on the server.
>You couldn't run a major site like that, that's why people use an image
>cache solution instead of generating the images each time. You'll figure
>it out eventually. Considering your lack of experience in administering
>servers I can see why this might seem alien to you. There's more to making
>web pages than you realize.
....you STILL can't refute my claim with even ONE link. Not one...not
even one. You can't find even ONE simple fuckin link that would prove
me wrong despite all your fuckwitted lil stories and shit about what
you and a bunch of other make believe people were supposedly
"tinkering" with back in the day.
And um, why do you think I want to start doing chit in Flash? Oh,
hey, free cl00, no increase in server load (not that that's a big
problem now with a bit of server side image caching).
You know what the NEAT thing about the Flash method is...no HTML
code...none. You can have FULLY perfect liquid website with NO HTML
AT ALL! Check this out:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/nocode.swf
He, he, he...what the fuck are you doin? HTML is dead d00d, didn't
you and the rest of the W3C supporting assholes get the fuckin memo?
>> Of course, now that I'm coding in Flash I can do that much faster and
>> much more efficiently by dumping the hybrid JS/PHP for what
>> ActionScript can do.
>I'm sure that's why most web applications are written in ActionScript.
ActionScript only works in Flash, Numbnuts. And it requires more
skill at the current moment, which is why it's not widely used.
>>>Hell, you don't even know how to
>>>position elements in CSS, you have to frame your site just to get it to
>>>center.
>> The only way to vertically position elements using CSS isn't
>> compatible with any browser on the Mac, Stupid.
>Wow, just when I think I've seen the depths of your ignorance you manage
>to dig a hole and jump in.
Okay, Junior, step it the fuck up then. Let's see your code for
VERTICALLY CENTERING content that's cross compatible with teh Mac.
>>>It's interesting that your harshest criticisms are of things you
>>>can't do.
>> On the contrary, I've already done them:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/wwcc/histology-1/
>>
>> However I've since transcended such compatibility deficient methods
>> for higher level, FULLY cross browser and cross platform compatible
>> solutions.
>You hide all your HTML in your javascript
Actually that's necessary in order to build a dynamic website...or did
you dumbass just not notice that every time you hit one of those lil
arrows no part of the base design ever gets needlessly reloaded. If I
had made that site in straight HTML I would have had to have created
like over 30 separate fuckin files...why in the name of the sweet baby
Jesus would I have wanted to do that?
>and all your formatting is in
>those "transcendental" <style> tags you also hide in the javascript.
>That's the only reason it validates. If you really understood CSS you
>wouldn't have any <style> tags.
Actually, I do understand CSS (better than you). Free cl00, unless
it's redundant either in form or out of design, you shouldn't be using
external style sheets. Granted I could have done something regarding
the positioning element, but the savings as far as overall size would
have been negligible.
>Nice try n00b. Like I said before, your
>just a poser, but a damn good one. Your persistence amazes me. Even in the
>face of insurmountable facts you still try, I at least have to give you
>that.
Yer the fuckin poser d00d, not me:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/nocode.swf
What the fuck have you produced here lately? Yeah, that's
right...NOTHING. Now why don't you just run along and produce a lil
more NOTHING. `, )
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
[Back to original message]
|