Posted by Mimic on 08/27/05 00:47

Fly Cooter wrote:
> In article <7miog1dgikba0ncahe0r8031qe8frpvoq8@4ax.com>,
> usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>
>>
>>Right nyah: this._quality = "best";
>>
>>Especially when you're exporting stand alone exe's for use on like a
>>CD-ROM, cause if you go over around 3.5MB it'll automatically drop to
>>like "shit" quality by default. o_O
>>
>
>>From what I can tell it takes longer to export, but it doesn't affect
>
>>the size and nor the rendering speed for that matter (although I'm on
>>a fairly speedy system). I'm assuming their "quality" settings are
>>just the form of image resizing (like bilinear/bicubic vs nearest
>>neighbor). Not sure what "best" is using, probably something like
>>Lanczos resizing.
>
>
> You are aware that the surfer can change the quality of how he views the
> Flash movie on his computer, right? Whatever you set is only the
> default.
>

furthermore, not only is he using the deprecated embed tag, in order to
attain "best" in HTML, you need to set it in the param tags. So he isnt
actually getting it at "best" anyway. Not to mention the fact that there
is absolutly no justifiable reason to have THAT at best quality. A high
res photo with zoom, maybe, but certianly not that.

--
Mimic

"The man who awaits the rising of the sun, cannot wait forever."
[email: ZGF0YWZsZXhAY2FubmFiaXNtYWlsLmNvbQ==]
Help Stop Spam - www.hidemyemail.net

[Back to original message]