Posted by jake on 08/28/05 19:43

In message <Xns96C08F022DE9jkorpelacstutfi@193.229.0.31>, Jukka K.
Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> writes
>jake <jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> We have been through this nonsense before, haven't we?
>
>The number and quality of the examples you presented was very informative.
>Thank you for making my point so clear.
>
Not a problem. Feel free to keep making wild claims (without any proof,
of course).

"...The reason is that if you try to use WEFT for anything real, you get
into a hopeless mess..."

regards.
--
Jake
(jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk .... just a spam trap.)

[Back to original message]