Posted by Neredbojias on 08/29/05 16:24

With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:

> Neredbojias wrote:
>
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
> >
> >> Neredbojias wrote:
> >>
> >>> With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
> >>>
> >>>> Neredbojias wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> Btw, sharks don't blink.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Some do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What?? -A blinkin' shark? That's as bad as a bloomin' flower!
> >>>>
> >>>> Stop swearing!
> >>>
> >>> Geez, you sure are bossy. For your information, colorful language is
> >>> part of the masculine mystique.
> >>
> >> That's what they say.
> >> It's us women who let men believe all that crap.
> >
> > Oh, yeah, like men really believe women.
>
> They do.
> It's not the woman's words they fall for, we know that. But we can
> make you believe anything we want you to believe. Regardless of what
> we seem to be saying to you.

That's what some women may *think*, but is it really true? Ask yourself
this question: Do men really believe anything?

Men are biological creatures. Their primary imperative is to propagate.
Their beliefs are subordinate to and reliant upon their natural urges.
Women even admit this, to wit: "Men think with their ****s."

> > For example, everyday I go
> > through all of Barbara Zygote's posted pearls of wisdom just for the
> > personal edification to be derived from perusing such picayunery.
> >
> > Guffaw, guffaw.
>
> You're so funny!

That was irony, not a tee-hee, ha-ha, back-slapping anecdote.

>
> > I am a fair-minded individual and will listen to what a woman has to say
> > - at least for a minute or so. If by then she hasn't made any sense,
> > it's off to the bozo bin of balderdash
>
> With men, only 30 seconds are needed to distinguish between 'worth
> listening to' and 'best smile and ignore'. To the men it makes no
> difference though. They will just assume we decided on 'worth
> listening to', as they can't tell the difference from our response.
> Which by the way is not because there is no difference - other women
> who are present will know - it's just that men fail to notice.

I pretty much agree with you there. But so what? The whole point of
talking to women in the first place is to see if they'll communicate on
a more tactile level so one has to sort out the chaff from the whey
somehow. And, of course, there are always more squid in the sea.

>
> > with all the other blabbermouths
> > who just happen to be primarily of the feminine persuasion.
>
> Of course. Men talk bullshit without blabbering.

Again, I agree. And again, the reasons are valid.

>
> > This, of
> > course, is an allegory for tuning them out - a complaint, you certainly
> > must have noticed, voiced almost exclusively by females
>
> Correct. See above.
>
> > and the more obsequious of their imposters.
>
> Women have imposters? Wonder why...

Oh, I think it's because some men are so confused by typical modern-day
dogma that they just give up and decide to go fem. Perhaps they believe
they will feel more satisfaction by becoming the plunkee, but I doubt if
it ever works. Women are in that position naturally and look at how
much they bitch.

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]