|
|
Posted by subRoutin@s!0.0^7ii on 09/08/05 03:49
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:04:21 -0700, in alt.flame Onideus Mad Hatter
<usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
:On 7 Sep 2005 23:05:54 GMT, "subRoutinè@s!0.0^7ii"
:<s007ii@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote:
:
:>:I've also fully admitted to being God himself...as well as a Vatican
:>:nun...a member of a drum corp...Irish...a vampire...a demon God..the
:>:devil...Jesus...the antichrist...really the list goes on and on.
:
:>Have you ever claimed to be Napoleon, kook?
:
:...talking to yourself, Fruitkook?
IKYABWAI.
:>:...I fail to see how your dribbling stupidity addresses my last post
:>:though, Poser Boi. Rip off any websites today? *snicker*
:
:>Tell me, did Nintendo just hand off its most distinguished trademark to you as
:>an act charity?
:
:Yeah pretty much.
ROTFLMAO! Which goes to show, anything given to you would of course, *have* to
be an act charity. Considering how woefully inept you are....
:Nintendo fully supports my site,
Sure they do. And of course you're friends with the Grand Nagus himself too?
:the same way that
:Disney/Nelvana/AGC support my CB site
Do they support your use of illegal warez to create their websites too? Wouldn't
that be considered a liability if they did?
:(although with that one there
:are certain restrictions). *shrugs*
[Smacks forehead] Like stealing their copyrighted property and using illegal
warez to create their websites perhaps?
:Again, how does this address the issue at hand...you know the one you
:keep trying to side step from? You know, how you have no skillz and
:you're a pathetic lying poser boi who couldn't design a decent
:original web site to save his life. Will you run away from the
:challenge I proposed, Poser Boi?
That is irrelevant considering your aversion to produce a licence as evidence
for the authorized use of their copyrighted trademarks.
An act of charity indeed. <snicker>
:>Or did you steal it? Surely you must possess a legal licence to
:>use Super Mario? Disney is notorious for seeking out copyright infringement, I
:>don't see why a powerhouse like Nintendo would be any different.
:
:*snicker* Hardly, hell Disney gave me full permission to put up CB
:eps that I taped off their network...
Then I'm sure that permission was given in the form of an authorized licence.
Otherwise, how would you prove it should a subpena challenge your assertion in
court?
:of course the series is no longer
:being shown and I can't release DVD quality versions, but otherwise
:they fully support teh site, even made me a "friends of Disney"
And you a have a pair of golden mouse ears to prove it no doubt?
:alliance member.
A bronze plaque with Mickey Mouse emblazoned on it?
: You'd be surprised at how far original creativity
:can take you.
You'd be surprised how pissed off these corporations get when you've infringed
their copyrights.
:You obviously know nothing about it since you take
:what's not yours and then openly claim it is yours.
What did I steal? The "ominous scrolly" mechanism for a Flash scrollbar or
images of Super Mario?
_-
-_
subRoutine <http://www.softtargets.com>
Overunity Energy Mechanism
0,0,1
Ari Asikainen's SPANK: <http://tinyurl.com/bv4sx>
Snotty Campbawl's SPANK: <http://tinyurl.com/c78on>
"Avoid normal situations." <byend.removethisbityousillyperson@eskimo.com> wrote
in message news:db7j9i$c3e$1@eskinews.eskimo.com...
> In alt.flame Scott Campbell <thundering_puddles@msn.com> wrote:
>
[...] Jack the Sycophant hiding behind a killfile and offering commentary on
someone without having to read the person's mean words in return.
"Scott Campbell" <thundering_puddles@msn.com>
<d9ukmm$4m2$0@pita.alt.net>
"But is it as disgusting as a coward that hides behind a killfile in order
that he can offer commentary on someone without having to read
the person's mean words in return?
I'll just add this to your ever-growing list of gutless behavior."
[Back to original message]
|