Posted by Fly Cooter on 09/14/05 06:29

In article <r9k9i119rhg04eo1nv0jspgv377jmkh0oi@4ax.com>,
usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>
>
>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:32:15 -0700, Fly Cooter
><fly_cooter_@example.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <xn0e71oy11ttov000@kookology.info>, sean@petitmorte.net says...
>>>
>>>
>>>PJR wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09 Sep 2005 20:42:48 GMT, Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote
>>>> in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>
>>>> > PJR wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:02:55 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>>>> >> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>> > >
>>>> >>> On 09 Sep 2005 16:39:58 GMT, "Sean Monaghan" <sean@petitmorte.net>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>>> This gay-lame/mutual-netKKKopping 'war' has a certain foul stench
>>>> >> to it.
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> ...*rechecks the thread*...
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> Um, all of the AUK regs posting in response to Fly Poofter are
>>>> doing >>> exactly what I was doing with teh gay routine...so am I
>>>> correct in >>> assuming that you mean to nominate the WHOLE of AUK?
>>>> Or maybe you >>> need to bash yer fuckin head into the wall and
>>>> rethink this one.
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> Further...what do you mean "mutual" netkopping? I never netkopped
>>>> >>> anything. I threatened to blow his lil Tripod smear off the face
>>>> of >>> the Inet, however that isn't netkopping, that's just being an
>>>> uber >>> evul fuckhead bastage. Netkopping is where you try and have
>>>> >>> something taken down, removed, silences, etc out of "genuine"
>>>> >>> reasons, not because you're doing it as a means of attacking a
>>>> >>> person. For example if Fly Poofter was trying to get the image
>>>> >>> taken down in order to "get back" at me, rather than doing it
>>>> >>> because he's on some righteous copyright infringement crusade.
>>>> >>> However retarded that endeavor is, it is a "genuine" reason.
>>>> > >
>>>> >> Your whining about your netkkkopping threats not really being
>>>> >> netkkkopping threats, because you'd enjoy being a netkkkop,
>>>> >> constitutes the lamest thing you've posted since your last
>>>> hilariously >> broken web page, Diapertard.
>>>> > >
>>>> >>>> I hereby nominate Onideus Mad Hatter and Fly Cooter, jointly, for
>>>> >> the >> Busted Urinal Award.
>>>> > > >
>>>> >>> I already have that one,
>>>> > >
>>>> >> Indeed you do, and quite a few others.
>>>> > >
>>>> >> Search Results
>>>> >> 6 matches for "moulton".
>>>> > >
>>>> >> Kook of the Month, December 2004 Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>>> >> Golden Killfile, December 2004 Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>>> >> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, December 2004 Matthew
>>>> >> "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>>> >> Busted Urinal Award Matthew "Diaperboy" Moulton
>>>> >> Unabomber Surprise Matthew "Diaperboy" Moulton
>>>> >> Kook Kard Deck, Four of Clubs Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>>>> > >
>>>> >>> Stupid...like 3 or 4 times now I think,
>>>> >
>>>> >> You can't win it more than once, Mathilda.
>>>> >
>>>> > I actually nominated the lame-war between Matthew and Flyboi.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed. I was commenting on Diaperboi's claim to have won the award
>>>> three or four times.
>>>>
>>>> I can't really comment on the nomination of the lame-war between him
>>>> and Fly Cooter, since I haven't bothered to read any of their lames
>>>> yet. However, I'm not keen on allowing Mr Blank-Web-Page a second BUA,
>>>> even if it's a joint one. He's not an interesting enough kook.
>>>>
>>>> > If you
>>>> > can't accept this nom, are there any other suitable awards for this
>>>> > pair? PAP, or Pickett, perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> PAP is open to anybody, and there are hardly any qualifications other
>>>> than being pathetic enough to be noticed in AUK. The Pickett is more
>>>> difficult to decide about. It has to involve an element of failed
>>>> crusading, and I can't see Diaperboi crusading at present.
>>>
>>>Good info - thanks.
>>>
>>>I hereby request a nomination morph, from the Busted Urinal Award, to
>>>the Pathetic Anal Pineapple Award, for Onideus Mad Hatter & Fly Cooter,
>>>jointly.
>>>
>>>Seconds, anyone?
>>
>>I'd say give the award to TestiClees alone but he might be incarcerated
>>soon. Why waste an award on someone who can't accept it. And please just
>>leave me out of anything connected with his name. I don't want anything
>>to do with this fucking homo erectus. But thanks anyhow.
>
>ROTFL...oh man, this just gets better and better! ^_^
>
>I should do photo manipulation more often:
>http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/Gay_Poofter.jpg
>http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/Fat_Poofter.jpg

Hey TestiClees. Did you know that when you post the same link 20 times its
spam?

--
Fly Cooter
http://fly-cooter.tripod.com

[Back to original message]