Posted by "messju mohr" on 09/13/05 13:08

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:56:33AM +0200, Ivo Jansch wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> messju mohr wrote:
>
> >> cache_groups only work, if you leave out the template parameter of clear_cache().
>
> Isn't that a bug then?

no.

> I thought cache_id's were meant to be able to have multiple cached
> versions of a single template. So a 1->N relation between template and
> cache_id.

a cache_groupd is a groups of *pages*, and not a group of templates.

you don't cache a template, you cache output (which may consists of
multiple templates when {include} is in use).

you't don't want to clear templates with clear_cache(), you want to
clear pages.

> If what you say is true, then 2 different templates, each using the same
> set of cachegroups (tpl a, group nl, group en; tpl b, group nl, group
> en) would not work?

it that would not work as *you* seem to expect, yes.

> This would mean I would have to add the template name to the cache
> group, or developers could by accident use the same id's and clear
> eachothers templates.

see above.

> Greetings,
> Ivo
>
> - --
> Ivo Jansch <ivo@ibuildings.nl>
> ibuildings.nl BV - information technology
> http://www.ibuildings.nl
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDJqJR95NUnGFZm9cRAn87AJ9OIheWocnk1MHvypv1y2KHrT255gCeI/N5
> OXniUH5+VJIQFmkVooY5e9g=
> =tUYW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Back to original message]