Posted by bryan on 09/17/05 04:20

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:52:09 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:

> On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:33:01 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:45:12 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>
>>------ 8< ------
>>
>>> That's actually almost entirely impossible you know...has to deal with
>>> psych stuff. Humans share a lot of innate reactions to certain
>>> things...it's quite easy to hook them. The idea is not to ignore me,
>>> the idea is to come to terms with me. It's like fear in many ways, yes
>>> you can ignore fear and to a degree that might prove effective...but
>>> until you face your fear...yeah.
>>
>>like you ph3ar me, matthew?
>
> ...who are y<SLAP>

bryan. you know, the one you ran away from.

>>where's your proof that agent can handle your malformed .sig?
>
> Oh, Credulity Boi, I remember you now. Did you ever find proof that could
> refute my link that proved my claims?

you really are full of it, aren't you, matthew?

you post a link to some other post by someone who says that agent can
handle outlook's malformed .sig and expect to get away with it?

that's nothing to do with agent being able to handle _your_ (agent 2.0)
malformed .sig.

now... here's what i want you to do.

not forgetting that i posted using agent 1.93, post proof of your
assertion that agent 1.93 or less can strip your malformed .sig or admit
you were wrong.

you can then apologise and slink off with your tail between your legs,
much like you did before, "net legend" :-)

> -- <--- malformed .sig
>
> Odious Mud Splatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.bilgewater-productions.net

[Back to original message]