|
|
Posted by bryan on 09/17/05 05:53
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:20:43 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:08:05 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
> wrote:
>
>>>>bryan. yo<COCK SLAP>
>>
>>> If you wanna suck my cock, Bryan, all ya gotta do is beg for it.
>
>>i think fly cooter was right...
>
> Awww, ya get bitch slapped by dat mean 'ol Mad Hatter so suddenly you
> wanna switch sides. *snicker*
switch sides? that must mean i was on your side at one point. i don't
think so, splatter.
> Poor lil Bryan, he's so confused, he's got more flip flops than a John
> Kerry campaign.
lame. try harder.
>>you do have homoerotic fantasies.
>
> Oh yeah, all the time, in fact I'm so unbelievably gay I can actually
> make people turn to the dark side of the rump ride simply by replying to
> one of their poasts...
>
> OMG WTF J00 HACE GOT TEH GHEY!!1!
aaaaargh! i will hace to confess to my partner that jo0 hace giben m3 teh
ghey!!!1!! what will (s)he say!!!1!!
>>in all of the photos i've seen of you,
>
> ...there's like 6.
punctuation, matthew.
>>there have been no females present, have there?
>
> And no males either, hrmmm...
jo0 are not male? is jo0 a dyek? uuuuurgh!
> try and figure that one out.
i have! uuuuurgh!
> ...actually all that's not entirely true, in that one pic of me where
> half the pic is all cut off there's a girl sitting next to me...not
> really any of your business though, I'm perfectly content with you
> believing I'm gay, because, well, quite frankly you just don't matter.
> *shrugs*
<feelings hurting...>
>>(insert "she" was taking the photo excuse here)
>
> Silly kook, everyone knows GOD took those pictures.
is that short for godfrey?
>>> Just like Fly Poofter, yer just as much a stupid Hatter addict as he
>>> is.
>
>>really? you're the one who just _had_ to reply to my posts, princess :-)
>
> And you're the one whose slurping Fly Poofter up the ass cause I went
> and bitch slapped you, Kiddo. ^_^
^^^^^^^
you misspelled slurped, matthew.
>>> You really are an idiot.
>
>>not really. my i.q. is a wee bit higher than 70, matthew...
>
> ...like I said, you really are an idiot.
duh.
>>and you still haven't posted proof.
>
> You haven't posted proof to the contrary, what's your point?
<sigh> you don't know how this works, do you? here, let me show you...
you make an assertion. i disprove that assertion. it is now up to you to
prove me wrong, ok? any diversion will be duly noted, "net legend".
>>>>you post a link to some other post by someone who says that agent can
>>>>handle outlook's malformed .sig and expect to get away with it?
>
>>> MUWAHAHAHAHA, I've "gotten away with it" now! You meddling kids and
>>> your lil dog can't hope to stop me now!
>
>>of course i can, you pesky "odious mud splatter"!
>
> Calling me names, boy I bet THAT'LL be an effective
> tactic...*snicker*...
yeah... it really works against me too" ;-)
>>>>that's nothing to do with agent being able to handle _your_ (agent
>>>>2.0) malformed .sig.
>
>>> Just remember one thing Bryan...only one of us actually cares. ^_^
>
>>but i wasn't the one who was virtually begging to be believed in their
>>last post, matthew... you do care!
>
> Okay, I care, keep thinking that.
you must care... you keep responding.
> *nods*
*winks*
> ...you are undeniably an idiot.
that's obvious... see how you have overwhelmed me with your superior
intellect?
bwahahahahahahaha!
>>>>now... here's what i want y<COCK SLAP>
>
>>> Bitches like you don't get to make demands,
>
>>of course<SLAP>
>
> Glad<SLAP>
my pleasure.
> --
>
> Odious Mud Splatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.bilgewater-productions.net
[Back to original message]
|