|
Posted by "leaf" on 09/17/05 18:26
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jasper Bryant-Greene" <jasper@bryant-greene.name>
To: <php-general@lists.php.net>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Quick Poll: PHP 4 / 5
> leaf wrote:
>>
>> Actually I choose array_pop for 2 reasons.
>> I like short code. I don't want to read thousands of lines just to get an
>> idea. I tend to think in very compact code. if you find that ugly and
>> unreadable. that's your preference. I find extended coding very ugly,
>> mostly because I'm a slow reader, and that is my preference
>
> And what about someone else that has to read/maintain your code in the
> future? What about when you come to read a "clever" but compact line of
> code that does 5 or 6 things on a single line, a few years down the track,
> and spend valuable time just trying to figure out what it actually does?
I think in compact code. so reading it back is not a problem. As for future
programmers who want to look at my code? That's never happened so far.
However I do keep good documentation. so reading and understanding my code
shouldn't be a problem.
>
>> I got use to working with pop and shift while I was doing perl work. so
>> to me pop'ing an array makes perfect sense.
>
> Sure, when there actually *is* an array to pop. In the following situation
> there is no array to actually pop (remove and return) the last element
> from, since you're using the return value of explode() while array_pop()
> expects a reference to a variable:
>
> $element = array_pop( explode( ',', $some_string ) );
No array to pop? .. explode returns an array. doesn't matter if its
temporary or has a variable assigned to it. its still an array.
>
> --
> Jasper Bryant-Greene
> Freelance web developer
> http://jasper.bryant-greene.name/
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
[Back to original message]
|