Posted by Neredbojias on 09/29/05 23:56

With neither quill nor qualm, "rf" <@invalid.com> quothed:

> [irrelevant crosspost snipped]
>
> Neredbojias wrote:
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Toby Inkster quothed:
> >
> > > jaYPee wrote:
> > >
> > > > anyone know how can I replace this code using only the div tag?
> > >
> > > Here you are:
> > >
> > > <div>
> >
> > How uncharacteristically thoughtless of you! You forgot to close the
> > tag (</div>).
>
> Tags are not "closed". They simply stand alone, by themselves.
>
> Elements, on the other hand, are usually closed. So, a div *element* must
> have a closing tag.
>
> The OP however asked (incorrctly) about using a div tag and Toby responded
> correctly. If the OP had asked about a div element the response would
> probably have been
> <div></div>

Grrr. But it annoys me when Toby is right even more than it does when
you are.

Fortunately, the frequency of such perturbations is tolerable.

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]