Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 10/03/05 16:50

"saz" <saz1958@nospammersexcite.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:MPG.1daa5a94f7352c9a9897d2@newsgroups.comcast.net...
> In article <nQ00f.147610$dP1.504820@newsc.telia.net>,
> jaggillarfotboll@telia.com says...



> IMO wouldn't be concerned with anything under 800 x 600.


That sounds reasonable but my page does not give big problems
with a width which is >600 or =600 does it?

> I made the window very small - 640 x 480. The reason your text is
> "squished" (but still readable) is your use of tables.

> If you continue to use tables, then move your nav buttons further to the
> left and make them narrower.

This alternative sounds reasonable.
A further solution would be to put them horizontally before the text is
coming
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/test-2.php

Eliminate the picture of the bird on the
> right and allow the table to flow that direction as well.
Where would I put it?


Utilizing
> both suggestions would help add another 150px to the available space on
> the page, resulting in less "squishing".

I could also have pictures which are narrower than 230.


--
Luigi Donatello Asero
(sono italiano ma vivo in Svezia)
(я итальянец но я живу в Швеции )
(我是 意大利人 , 但是 我 住 在 瑞典)
(minä olen Italian kansalainen, mutta minä asun Ruotsissa)
(yo soy italiano mas yo vivo en Suecia)
(je suis italien mais je habite a la Suede)
(ich bin Italiener aber ich lebe in Schweden)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/index.php

[Back to original message]