Posted by sagejoshua on 11/28/72 11:30

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:53:21 -0500, kchayka <usenet@c-net.us> wrote:

>Some alternative methods are shown at
><URL:http://www.mezzoblue.com/tests/revised-image-replacement/>
>
>The Gilder/Levin method seems to be less bad than most, but it does have
>some limitations.

I've checked those out. I just didn't know which one to use. I guess I
don't quite understand the need for FIR... I used it under the
assumption that I was making my pages more accessible. If that's not
the case, then in your opinion, what is the best way to represent a
header with an image? Just put the <img> in the <h> with no text and
an alt tag? I'm kind of lost.

>
>> Netscape 4.x even renders negative margins correctly.
>
>I hope this doesn't mean you're trying to get NS4 to render the page the
>same as the latest Opera or FF? What a huge waste of effort!

I just meant that it seemed to be the most cross-browser compatible
mode of centering. After reading what rf said about using negative
margins, I think I've changed my mind. Before, I just used <div
align="center">, but I know that's pretty bad, too. It seems that his
suggestion of using auto margins and text-align(for IE) is the best
way. Right?

Thanks for all your time and help.

Josh

[Back to original message]