Posted by GamblerZG on 11/05/05 09:37

Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 02:17, GamblerZG wrote:
>
>>Robert Cummings wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:56, GamblerZG wrote:
>> >
>> >>Miles Thompson wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>You missed the most important: This list works, why break it?
>> >>
>> >>Nope, I did not miss it. It's just not a proper reply to the message. I
>> >>did not suggest to disable mailing lists or change them in any way, so
>> >>the "break" factor does not apply.
>> >
>> >
>> > Then you suggest fragmenting the list into 3 factions, those who would
>> > continue to use the list, those who would use the forum, and those who
>> > would use both. By such a fragmentation of the list, solutions and
>> > advice would be spread across multiple locations thus diluting the
>> > efficacy of the list.
>>
>>I seriously doubt that giving people a choice over communication methods
>>would reduce efficiency. It's like saying that having multiple OSes
>>reduces efficiency of programming.
>
>
> I didn't use the word efficiency, I used the word efficacy (feel free to
> look it up).
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.

They're synonyms, and I do not see a big difference in their meanings.
Feel free to disambiguate.

--
Best regards,
Roman S.I.

http://sf.net/projects/naturalgine/

[Back to original message]