Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 11/28/05 06:37

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:57:09 -0700, Neredbojias
<invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:

>> Well I guess the slow children like you need a little more
>> clarification, huh? Would you be less of a pissy little girl if I
>> said all major browser engines?

>"If you said" and "what you said" are 2 different things, aren't they?

Arguing semantics again?

>Would you be less of a jerk if you really knew what you were doing?

Would you be less of an idiot if you really knew what you were doing?

>> Of course I suppose then you'll start
>> wetting your training panties and whining that the text of the script
>> labels it as Netscape instead of Mozilla, but then I never claimed the
>> script was mine, Stupid, I just claimed it worked.

>Duh, and it doesn't, as I claimed. Of course, it looks like you'll just
>never be able to understand that.

While your retarded lil fingers keep molesting your keyboard...it
still works perfectly:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/detect.html

Now then, which major browser and OS combination does that not work
with?

>> >As I said before, even if you accept browser-sniffing as a tactic of
>> >value,

>> Are you claiming there's ANOTHER way of detecting whether a browser
>> can handle the various aspects of PNG files? Oh, please, oh great
>> master of the stupid, tell us all what it is!

>You ask me a question, assume the answer, then attach another question
>onto the arbitrary choice you've made. You're a real beauty...

That's a lovely sidestep, but you still didn't answer the question,
here, let me post it again, for the benefit of your stupidity:

Are you claiming there's ANOTHER way of detecting whether a browser
can handle the various aspects of PNG files? Oh, please, oh great
master of the stupid, tell us all what it is!

>> >that script simply doesn't do what you claimed it did.
>>
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/detect.html
>>
>> Oh no? Seems to detect FF just fine, Downs.

>So? Did I ever say it didn't. I said it didn't detect Mozilla in spite
>of your feeble attempt to "adjust" the issue.

Mozilla is a major browser now, is it? Tell me, Stupid, why does the
script need to detect Mozilla? See that's the big part you dribbling
little idiots keep skipping...the whole POINT of your rambling,
incoherent stupidity. Oh...I guess rambling, incoherent stupidity
*IS* the point of your reply, huh?

I'll tell you what, Downs, you tell me WHY, specifically, you need the
script to be able to detect the now DEFUNCT Mozilla browser and I'll
revise the script to include it. How's that, huh? You prove to
everyone that you're not just a stupid fucking MORON and I'll give you
a lil gift. ^_^

>> >Furthermore, you sound like a child in the process of being raised
>> >improperly. Everyone has an ego, yes, but everyone makes mistakes, too.
>>
>> Yes, yes they do...but then I can correct them:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/detect.html
>>
>> You weren't arguing against my work originally, Stupid, you were
>> arguing against someone elses. Doesn't work so well when I'm the one
>> whose rewritten it, neh?
>
>Who cares whose work it is? This isn't a personal attack on the author,
>it's a statement that the script is sub-par.

The script won't wipe your ass for you either, Stupid, but that
doesn't make it sub-par. You are right about one thing though..it's
not a personal attack on the author, it's a FAILING effort to try and
attack me. What's the matter, did that mean 'ol Mad Hatter fuck up
your day or something?

>> >Own up to it, Onideus: you ain't as good as it gets by a long shot.

>> Oh no? Well then you should be able to tell me of a site that has
>> fading text effects like this one:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/cbstory/

>This is your idea of "as good as it gets?"

I see you're unable to find a site that has that effect...oh, hey,
looks it's me...not surprised.

>> You should also be able to tell me of a site that employs a perfect
>> liquid image structure using multiple images:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/alt.2600/

>And this is your idea of "as good as it gets?"

Is that your idea of telling me of a site that employs a perfect
liquid image structure using multiple images...cause uh, your
retardation of the English language doesn't look much like a
hyperlink, Trainable.

>> I'm as good as it gets, Kiddo...in a lot of areas.

>I doubt that.

....well then where are your links, Stupid?

>As they say, "There's always someone better."
>Furthermore, the evidence you offer for your claim is especially
>dubious.

....well then where are the links, Stupid?

>> Oh but hey, do
>> feel free to attempt to prove me wrong.

>Why should I?

....to avoid looking like a stupid, moronic, fucking retard?

>You going to pay me?

It's yer ego on the line, Kiddo, not mine...like I said, I've got the
sites, I've got the work...you don't have shit. There are only two
kinds of people online...those who produce...and those who run at the
fuckin mouth...guess which one you are!

>> And, you know, when you
>> backpedal,

>Yeah, lots of people who converse with you backpedal, don't they?

Only the ones who talk shit with nothing to back it up like you.
Again, WHERE ARE YOUR LINKS?

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

[Back to original message]