Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 12/04/05 13:19

On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:59:53 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:

Your stupidity is beyond amazing...check this out...

>1. An image can not (I repeat: *can* *not*) be 72 PPI.

http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/mine3.png

That image has EXACTLY 72 pixels per inch, count them out if you're
feeling especially stupid, MORON.

>2. PPI says nothing about DPI. Nothing. Nothing at all.

Um, yeah it does, Stupid. For example, if you tell me you have an
image that has a PPI of 72, I can tell you it's going to print like
shit! WOAH...I must be like Miss fuckin Cleo, huh?

Here, let me Wikislap you!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dots_per_inch

"The number of pixels per inch in a computer display is sometimes
specified in this way as well. Usage of the DPI measurement in these
cases is considered by some to be inaccurate and misleading, though
the intended meaning is usually clear based on context."

Oh ho...you got BITCH SLAPED! ROTFL...tsch, tsch, tsch...it's too bad
stupidity like yours isn't painful.

>I think yo<COCK SLAP>

Wikipedia thinks you're an idiot, how do you feel about that?

Oh hey, BTW...yer site looks like shit: http://www.sandman.net/

Is that the style for Mac addict wannabe web artists these days?
*snicker*

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

[Back to original message]